Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00325

Introduced
2/25/10  
Refer
2/25/10  
Report Pass
3/23/10  
Refer
3/30/10  
Report Pass
4/7/10  
Refer
4/14/10  
Report Pass
4/19/10  
Report Pass
4/20/10  
Engrossed
5/1/10  

Caption

An Act Repealing Certain Statutes Related To The Department Of Economic And Community Development.

Impact

This legislation, set to take effect on July 1, 2010, has implications for state laws pertaining to economic development and employment. By repealing specific sections of existing laws, the bill removes previous requirements that could have acted as barriers to efficient state operations and procurement processes. This could enhance the state's competitiveness in the rapidly evolving technology sector, particularly as it relates to information systems and telecommunications.

Summary

Senate Bill 325, also known as Substitute Bill No. 325, focuses on repealing various statutes related to the Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development. The bill aims to streamline contractual processes and regulations that govern the awarding of state contracts, particularly in the domain of information systems and telecommunications. Through its provisions, the bill seeks to modify how contractors are engaged with state agencies, reflecting an effort to ensure better accountability and performance standards.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SB 325 appears to be positive among proponents who advocate for modernization and efficiency within state operations. Supporters argue that the repeal of outdated statutes will lead to a more responsive and agile state government, capable of adapting to new economic realities. However, some concerns may arise regarding the protections for employees affected by contractual changes, particularly whether adequate support and job placement services will be guaranteed for state workers whose positions are outsourced.

Contention

The repeal of existing statutes brings about a key point of contention: balancing the need for efficient governmental operations with the rights and protections of employees affected by these changes. Advocates for workforce protection stress the importance of maintaining robust job security and benefits for workers who might be displaced by new contracting rules. The discussion around SB 325 highlights the ongoing challenge of ensuring economic advancement while safeguarding the interests of state employees.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB954

Dental services: third-party network access.

DC B25-0265

Contract No. GAGA-2022-C-0259 with SodexoMagic, LLC Approval and Payment Authorization Emergency Act of 2023

TX SB543

Relating to oversight of and requirements applicable to state contracts and other state financial and accounting issues; authorizing fees.

TX HB1426

Relating to certain requirements applicable to contracts entered into by, and the contract management process of, state agencies.

MS HB934

Healthcare Contracting Simplification Act; create.

NJ S3443

Requires State Contract Managers to monitor work conducted by subcontractors on State contracts.

NJ A4487

Requires State Contract Managers to monitor work conducted by subcontractors on State contracts.

CA SB681

Public employees’ retirement: contracting agencies: termination.