Connecticut Senate Bill SB00410

Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/4/10
• Refer: 3/4/10
• Report Pass: 3/16/10
• Refer: 3/26/10
• Report Pass: 4/1/10
• Refer: 4/8/10

Caption

An Act Concerning Persons Who Transport Patients Or Clients Under The Care, Control Or Custody Of A State Agency.

Impact

This law will enforce stricter conditions on personnel involved in the transportation of clients, thereby ensuring that individuals entrusted with such responsibilities meet specific safety and compliance standards. The provisions requiring training on securing individuals with disabilities highlight the bill's focus on promoting safety for all passengers, particularly those with unique needs. By instituting a pilot program for interagency cooperation in monitoring driving records, the bill aims to streamline processes and potentially save state resources in compliance checks.

Summary

SB00410 is a legislative act aimed at ensuring the safety and compliance of individuals employed by state agencies who transport patients or clients under their care, control, or custody. The bill mandates that transport vehicle operators possess a valid motor vehicle operator's license and have no moving violations or license suspensions within the past year. It further stipulates that state agencies must conduct annual reviews of their employees' driving records to ensure adherence to these regulations. This measure seeks to enhance accountability and safety during the transportation of vulnerable populations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00410 appears to be largely positive, particularly among advocates for patient safety and oversight. Supporters of the bill argue that it strengthens the protection of clients during transportation and improves the overall accountability of state employees. However, any potential financial implications or administrative burdens generated by the new compliance requirements could foster dissent among some state agencies concerned about funding and resource allocation for enforcement.

Contention

While the bill’s provisions are generally viewed as necessary for improving safety standards, there may be concerns about the feasibility of implementation across various state agencies. Critics could argue that the extra administrative tasks related to yearly driving record checks and additional training requirements may stretch resources thin. The necessity for training protocols tailored for transporting clients with disabilities could also raise questions about the availability of adequate training materials and personnel.