Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00467

Introduced
3/12/10  
Refer
3/12/10  
Report Pass
3/24/10  
Refer
4/5/10  
Report Pass
4/12/10  
Refer
4/21/10  
Report Pass
4/22/10  

Caption

An Act Establishing The Lean Government Steering Committee.

Impact

The implementation of this bill could have a considerable impact on how state agencies operate, potentially leading to faster service delivery and improved public interactions. By reducing bureaucratic obstacles and focusing on enhancements based on metrics and visual controls, the bill seeks to create a government that is more responsive to the needs of its constituents. The financial allocation provided will assist the committee in its foundational steps towards reforming these processes.

Summary

SB00467 establishes the Lean Government Steering Committee aimed at improving the efficiency of state administrative processes. This committee's primary focus will be on applying 'lean techniques,' which are designed to enhance customer service and optimize the value delivered to the public. It emphasizes the need for continuous improvement, employee involvement, and a streamlined decision-making process through rapid implementation, which collectively aims to reduce complexity within state agencies.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB00467 appears to be supportive, especially among stakeholders interested in government reform and efficiency. Proponents believe that the introduction of lean techniques will lead to a more effective and customer-focused public administration. However, there may be concerns regarding the practicality of implementing such techniques and their long-term sustainability within existing governmental structures.

Contention

While the bill has garnered general support for its intent to foster efficiency, there may be underlying contention regarding the specifics of implementation. Some stakeholders might express concerns on how this approach could affect traditional methods of public service and whether sufficient training and resources are allocated adequately to realize the intended benefits. Ensuring that changes do not disrupt essential services or diminish the quality of public interactions will be crucial.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MI HB4870

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MI HB4326

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

CA SB602

Advisory bodies.

CA SB1048

Advisory bodies.

CA AB3239

Advisory bodies.

KS HR6003

Providing temporary rules of the House of Representatives for the 2023 session until permanent rules are adopted.

MN HC1

A house concurrent resolution relating to the regent nomination joint committee.

AZ HB2443

Campaign finance; contributions limits