Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05203

Introduced
2/16/11  
Introduced
2/16/11  
Refer
3/2/11  
Refer
3/2/11  
Report Pass
3/18/11  
Report Pass
3/18/11  
Refer
3/28/11  
Refer
3/28/11  
Report Pass
4/4/11  
Report Pass
4/4/11  
Refer
4/12/11  
Refer
4/12/11  
Report Pass
4/18/11  
Report Pass
4/18/11  
Refer
5/4/11  

Caption

An Act Authorizing An Agricultural Conservation Easement On The Lands Of The Southbury Training School.

Impact

The enactment of this bill would create a legal framework for maintaining agricultural use of the designated lands. By permitting a nonprofit to oversee the easement, the state intends to foster agricultural activity while establishing guidelines to ensure the land is used appropriately. If the nonprofit fails to utilize the easement for agricultural purposes or relinquishes ownership, the easement will revert to state control. This ensures ongoing state oversight and protection of the land, safeguarding its agricultural character against potential development pressures.

Summary

House Bill 05203 aims to authorize an agricultural conservation easement on the properties of the Southbury Training School located in the towns of Southbury and Roxbury, Connecticut. The bill allows the Commissioner of Developmental Services to grant this easement to a qualifying nonprofit organization dedicated to agriculture. This initiative seeks to ensure the permanent protection of agricultural lands and facilitate their use for agricultural purposes, thereby promoting local farming and sustainability.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB 05203 appears to be positive as it promotes agricultural preservation and utilization of land that has historically provided services through the Southbury Training School. Legislators and community advocates are expected to support initiatives that enhance agricultural development, particularly in regions where farming may contribute to local economies and community well-being.

Contention

While the bill seems to garner general support, there may also be concerns related to the management of the easement and the involvement of nonprofits in land use decisions. Discussions could arise about the potential for bureaucratic challenges or the effectiveness of nonprofit organizations in fulfilling stewardship roles. Furthermore, ensuring that the needs and interests of local residents are represented in overseeing the easement remains a critical point of consideration.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

VA HB1721

Condemnation of conservation or open-space easement; compensation, Uniform Easement Relocation Act.

CA SB948

California Environmental Quality Act community plans.

TX SB1009

Relating to the adoption of the Uniform Easement Relocation Act.

AR HB1408

To Create The Uniform Easement Relocation Act.

OK HB1060

Easements; the Oklahoma Uniform Easement Relocation Act of 2025; easement relocation; court orders; effective date.

UT HB0132

Uniform Easement Relocation Act

GA HR1085

Property; granting of nonexclusive easements; authorize

GA HR1113

Property; granting of nonexclusive easements; authorize