Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05375

Introduced
1/19/11  
Introduced
1/19/11  
Refer
1/19/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning Greenhouse Gases Produced By Residential, State And Municipal Buildings.

Impact

If enacted, HB 05375 would amend the general statutes related to building energy efficiency, specifically targeting older structures that are notorious for their energy inefficiency. The legislation is positioned as a necessary measure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which are significant contributors to climate change. In doing so, the bill will likely influence state laws surrounding building codes and environmental standards, aligning them with modern energy efficiency goals. The expectation is that retrofitting older buildings will not only help the environment but also present potential cost savings for homeowners and local administrations through reduced energy consumption.

Summary

House Bill 05375 aims to address greenhouse gas emissions produced by residential, state, and municipal buildings. The bill's central focus is on mandating retrofit insulation for older housing and public buildings, thereby encouraging a reduction in energy loss. By requiring these retrofits, the bill seeks not only to mitigate the environmental impact caused by inefficient structures but also to promote energy conservation across the state. It highlights a commitment to sustainable building practices and outlines an important role for the state in enhancing the energy performance of its buildings.

Conclusion

Overall, HB 05375 signals a legislative effort toward enhancing environmental sustainability in building practices. However, the discussions surrounding its introduction will likely weigh the balance between progressive environmental policies and the economic realities faced by residents and local governments.

Contention

While the bill presents potential environmental benefits, it may also face criticism from stakeholders concerned about the financial implications of mandatory retrofitting. Opponents could argue that the costs associated with these improvements may burden homeowners, especially those in lower-income brackets. Additionally, there could be concerns about the feasibility and practical implementation of such retrofitting measures. Stakeholders may advocate for a more flexible approach that encourages voluntary participation or provides financial incentives rather than imposing strict requirements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.