Connecticut House Bill HB05444

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/19/11
• Refer: 1/19/11
• Refer: 2/1/11
• Report Pass: 3/8/11
• Refer: 3/14/11
• Report Pass: 3/21/11

Caption

An Act Concerning The Value Of A Totalled Motor Vehicle.

Impact

The impact of HB 05444 on state laws is significant, as it modifies existing statutes related to motor vehicle insurance and claims handling. By mandating that insurers use reputable sources for vehicle valuation, the bill aims to protect consumers from low settlement offers that may not reflect the true market value of their totaled vehicles. Additionally, the bill requires insurers to notify claimants about their rights to dispute the valuation, fostering greater consumer awareness and engagement in the claims process.

Summary

House Bill 05444 addresses the valuation of totaled motor vehicles by insurance companies. The bill aims to enhance transparency and fairness in the claims process, specifically when a vehicle is deemed a constructive total loss by an insurer. Under the proposed legislation, insurance companies are required to calculate the settlement amount based on various industry-standard sources, which include the National Automobile Dealers Association used car guide and another approved source. This change is intended to provide claimants with a more equitable valuation of their vehicles post-accident.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 05444 appears to be supportive among consumer advocacy groups and legislators who prioritize consumer protection. Many see the bill as a necessary measure to hold insurance companies accountable and ensure that individuals receive fair compensation for their losses. However, there may be some apprehension from insurance companies regarding the potential impacts on their operational costs and claims processes, which could lead to some pushback during discussions.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from the implementation of the new valuation guidelines imposed by the bill. Some opponents may argue that requiring insurers to use specific sources for valuation could lead to increased premiums or delays in the claims process. Additionally, there may be concerns that the bill does not adequately address the complexities involved in valuing unique or less typical vehicles, which might not fit neatly into standardized valuation frameworks.