Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05479 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1-General Assembly Committee Bill No. 5479
2-January Session, 2011 LCO No. 4904
3- *04904HB05479PD_*
1+General Assembly Proposed Bill No. 5479
2+January Session, 2011 LCO No. 1250
43 Referred to Committee on Planning and Development
54 Introduced by:
6-(PD)
5+REP. REYNOLDS, 42nd Dist. SEN. PRAGUE, 19th Dist.
76
87 General Assembly
98
10-Committee Bill No. 5479
9+Proposed Bill No. 5479
1110
1211 January Session, 2011
1312
14-LCO No. 4904
15-
16-*04904HB05479PD_*
13+LCO No. 1250
1714
1815 Referred to Committee on Planning and Development
1916
2017 Introduced by:
2118
22-(PD)
19+REP. REYNOLDS, 42nd Dist.
20+
21+SEN. PRAGUE, 19th Dist.
2322
2423 AN ACT CONCERNING CONSIDERATIONS IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING APPEALS.
2524
2625 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:
2726
28-Section 1. Subsection (g) of section 8-30g of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2011):
29-
30-(g) Upon an appeal taken under subsection (f) of this section, the burden shall be on the commission to prove, based upon the evidence in the record compiled before such commission that the decision from which such appeal is taken and the reasons cited for such decision are supported by sufficient evidence in the record. The commission shall also have the burden to prove, based upon the evidence in the record compiled before such commission, that (1) (A) the decision is necessary to protect substantial public interests in health, safety, or other matters which the commission may legally consider; (B) such public interests clearly outweigh the need for affordable housing; and (C) such public interests cannot be protected by reasonable changes to the affordable housing development, [or] (2) (A) the application [which] that was the subject of the decision from which such appeal was taken would locate affordable housing in an area which is zoned for industrial use and which does not permit residential uses, and (B) the development is not assisted housing, as defined in subsection (a) of this section, or (3) (A) the application that was the subject of the decision from which such appeal was taken would locate affordable housing on a lot that is unbuildable pursuant to the commission's regulations in effect at the time such application is filed, and (B) such lot cannot be made buildable due to natural conditions of the property. If the commission does not satisfy its burden of proof under this subsection, the court shall wholly or partly revise, modify, remand or reverse the decision from which the appeal was taken in a manner consistent with the evidence in the record before it.
31-
32-
33-
34-
35-This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
36-Section 1 October 1, 2011 8-30g(g)
37-
38-This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
39-
40-Section 1
41-
42-October 1, 2011
43-
44-8-30g(g)
27+That section 8-30g of the general statutes be amended to provide that, in any appeal from the denial of an affordable housing application, the judge shall consider (1) any claim by the commission that the land that is the subject of the appeal is unsuitable for the proposed development; (2) whether the type of affordable housing units being proposed are needed in the municipality; (3) the commission's objections to a proposed development's noncompliance with regulations concerning grading, height and setbacks; (4) whether the number of affordable housing units being proposed outweighs the commission's concerns about the proposed development; and (5) whether the proposed development would be located in a design district, and such considerations shall apply retroactively to any pending appeal.
4528
4629 Statement of Purpose:
4730
4831 To amend the criteria a judge must consider in an appeal of a denial of an affordable housing application.
49-
50-[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets. Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.]
51-
52-
53-
54-Co-Sponsors: REP. REYNOLDS, 42nd Dist.; SEN. PRAGUE, 19th Dist.
55-
56-Co-Sponsors:
57-
58-REP. REYNOLDS, 42nd Dist.; SEN. PRAGUE, 19th Dist.
59-
60-H.B. 5479