Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05591

Introduced
1/20/11  
Introduced
1/20/11  
Refer
1/20/11  
Refer
1/20/11  
Refer
3/17/11  
Refer
3/17/11  
Report Pass
3/23/11  
Report Pass
3/23/11  
Refer
4/1/11  
Refer
4/1/11  
Report Pass
4/7/11  
Report Pass
4/7/11  
Refer
5/4/11  

Caption

An Act Extending The Rental Rebate Application Period.

Impact

The bill is likely to have a significant impact on renters who rely on the rental rebate grants provided by the state. By extending the application period, HB 05591 seeks to reduce the barriers for applicants, potentially ensuring that more eligible individuals and families can secure the financial assistance they need. This could lead to greater stability for some renters, allowing them to remain in their homes without the fear of economic hardship. The modification could also alleviate pressure on local municipalities in managing these applications efficiently, which is critical for effective implementation of housing assistance programs.

Summary

House Bill 05591 aims to extend the application period for rental rebates in Oklahoma. The current process stipulated that renters must apply for grants within a specified timeline, and this bill proposes to modify those dates, providing more flexibility for applicants. The intention is to accommodate individuals who may face challenges in meeting the deadlines due to various circumstances, such as illness or other emergencies. This change is expected to help a broader range of renters to access the benefits available to them under the law.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB 05591 appears to be supportive, particularly among advocacy groups focused on housing and social welfare. These supporters emphasize the need for greater accessibility to government programs for renters who may face various obstacles in their daily lives. However, there may be some concerns regarding the administrative capacity of local agencies to handle the increased number of applications if the bill is passed. There is a belief that expanding access to these grants is a positive step towards supporting vulnerable populations.

Contention

While the bill is generally viewed in a positive light, some legislators could express concern regarding the potential for increased administrative burden on local governments to process an influx of applications. Questions may arise about how efficiently these changes can be implemented without overwhelming the existing systems. Furthermore, a counter-argument might highlight the importance of maintaining strict timelines for applications to ensure program integrity and prevent misuse of the grants. Thus, while the intent is beneficial, the execution and resource allocation will be key discussion points.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB07368

An Act Concerning The Use Of Mass Appraisal Software.

CT SB00870

An Act Concerning The Recommendations Of The Office Of Policy And Management.

CT HB05593

An Act Concerning The Reapplication Procedure For Elderly Property Tax Relief.

CT HB05169

An Act Concerning The Recommendations Of The Intergovernmental Policy And Planning Division Within The Office Of Policy And Management And The Extension Of The Commission On Connecticut’s Development And Future.

CT HB07295

An Act Concerning Minor Revisions To The Renters Rebate Program.

CT SB01343

An Act Concerning The Recommendations Of The Intergovernmental Policy And Planning Division Within The Office Of Policy And Management.

CT HB05573

An Act Concerning Municipal Participation In The Circuit Breaker Tax Relief Program.

CT SB00105

An Act Concerning The Rental Rebate Application Period.