Connecticut House Bill HB05650

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/11
• Refer: 1/21/11

Caption

An Act Concerning Transfers Of General Fund Surplus To The Budget Reserve Fund.

Impact

The measures proposed in HB 05650 would directly affect state financial management practices. By ensuring that a larger portion of any surplus is allocated to the Budget Reserve Fund, the bill seeks to bolster the state’s ability to respond to budgetary challenges. This legislative change could lead to a more proactive approach towards fiscal planning in the state, as it mandates routine assessments of financial projections and necessitates actions based on those assessments. The implications could be far-reaching, affecting future appropriations and funding allocations for various state programs and services.

Summary

House Bill 05650 aims to enhance the fiscal stability of the state by amending existing statutes to increase the maximum permissible balance of the Budget Reserve Fund from 10% to 15% of the current fiscal year net appropriations from the General Fund. This change is intended to create a more secure financial buffer for the state, allowing it to better manage economic uncertainties and potential budget deficits. The bill also stipulates that if any monthly financial statement projects a surplus exceeding 1% of the current fiscal year net appropriations, the State Treasurer is required to transfer that surplus into the Budget Reserve Fund during that month.

Contention

Debate surrounding HB 05650 may revolve around the balance between maintaining a healthy reserve fund and the immediate funding needs of various state programs. Supporters of this bill may argue that prioritizing the Budget Reserve Fund will provide greater long-term fiscal security and safeguard against future economic downturns. Conversely, critics might contend that setting such a high threshold for reserve funds could divert crucial resources away from essential services and programs that require immediate attention. This tension reflects broader concerns about the financial priorities of the state and the trade-offs associated with fiscal conservatism.