Connecticut House Bill HB06139

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/25/11
• Refer: 1/25/11
• Refer: 2/10/11

Caption

An Act Increasing The Independence Of The Board Of Directors Of Bradley International Airport.

Impact

If enacted, HB 06139 will bring significant changes to the governance of Bradley International Airport. The new framework will empower the Board of Directors not only to approve operational budgets and community relations policies but also to ensure that the airport's interests are fully represented. This change acknowledges the airport's potential as a vital economic engine for the state while ensuring that the Board can function effectively without being overly constrained by bureaucratic processes, thereby enabling swifter decision-making.

Summary

House Bill 06139 aims to enhance the operational independence of the Board of Directors of Bradley International Airport. This bill proposes structural changes by altering the composition of the Board of Directors, which will consist of seven members with a broader authority to manage the airport. By increasing the number of appointed private sector members from three to five, the bill seeks to streamline governance and enhance accountability within the airport's administration. The amendments also aim to solidify the Board's role in advocating for the airport as a crucial economic development resource for Connecticut.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to lean positively among stakeholders, particularly those who believe in strengthening the airport's economic role. Proponents argue that a more independent Board can respond better to the challenges facing the airport, enhance operational efficiency, and utilize its revenues more effectively for infrastructure and marketing. However, there are also concerns regarding how this increased independence will be managed, particularly in ensuring that community feedback remains integral to decision-making processes.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around balancing independence with local oversight. Some critics may express concerns over a perceived reduction in state control and the fear that a Board too focused on economic growth could sideline community interests. Furthermore, the proposed changes to Board composition and authority might ignite discussions about the transparency of decision-making processes and accountability to the public, especially regarding the engagement of consultants and the management of contracts.