Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06211

Introduced
1/26/11  
Refer
1/26/11  
Refer
3/17/11  

Caption

An Act Providing Uniform Fines For Various Illegal Uses Of A Mobile Telephone While Operating A Motor Vehicle.

Impact

The enactment of HB 06211 would standardize fines across the state for violations linked to mobile phone usage while driving. Specifically, it sets a penalty structure where a first violation incurs a $100 fine, escalating to $200 for repeat offenses. Additionally, it emphasizes community safety by discouraging behaviors that lead to distracted driving, thus potentially reducing road accidents associated with mobile device distractions. This bill represents a proactive step toward safer driving conditions in the state.

Summary

House Bill 06211 aims to provide uniform fines for illegal uses of mobile telephones while operating a motor vehicle. This legislation is directed at reducing distractions for drivers, particularly concerning the use of handheld mobile phones, with penalties set for violations. The key provisions define what constitutes the use of a mobile telephone and the implications for both hand-held and hands-free usage. The intent is to enhance road safety by creating a consistent regulatory landscape regarding mobile device use in vehicles.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be generally supportive from safety advocacy groups, who view it as a necessary measure to combat the rising issue of distracted driving. However, there may be concerns from certain segments of the population who feel penalizing drivers could be excessive or misdirected. The dichotomy of promoting public safety against the rights of individuals to communicate freely while on the road presents an area of contention in legislative discussions.

Contention

Notably, discussions around this bill may lead to debates regarding the appropriate level of regulation in personal freedom for drivers. While supporters argue for the necessity of such laws to mitigate risks on the road, critics may see it as an overreach into personal liberties. The bill's explicit detail on mobile device definitions and the allowance for hands-free options may also lead to discussions about the efficacy of regulations and whether they are sufficient to address the challenges posed by emerging technologies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

VA SB1339

Virginia Telephone Privacy Protection Act; telephone solicitations by text message, effective date.

CA AB1231

Telecommunications: combining lifeline, federal lifeline, and federal Affordable Connectivity Program subsidies.

NC H936

Robocall Solicitation Modifications

CA SB716

Lifeline program: broadband internet access service.

CA AB1588

Telecommunications: duties of local exchange carriers.

CA AB2808

Primary ticket sellers.

CA AB2885

False campaign speech and online platform disclosures.

CA SB1272

Crimes: intercepting telephone communications.