Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06263

Introduced
2/1/11  
Refer
2/1/11  
Report Pass
3/18/11  
Refer
3/28/11  
Refer
3/28/11  
Report Pass
4/4/11  
Report Pass
4/4/11  
Refer
4/12/11  
Refer
4/12/11  
Report Pass
4/18/11  
Report Pass
4/18/11  
Refer
5/4/11  
Refer
5/4/11  
Report Pass
5/10/11  
Engrossed
5/27/11  
Report Pass
5/31/11  
Report Pass
5/31/11  
Chaptered
6/28/11  
Enrolled
6/30/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Transition From The Ten Mill Program.

Impact

The proposed changes impact how land classified as forest land is taxed, providing a graduated yield tax based on the number of years the land has been classified. Under the new provisions, landowners will have a clearer understanding of their tax obligations and may find it more appealing to manage their land in ways that contribute to forest conservation without significant tax liabilities. Additionally, the bill enables landowners to reclassify their land upon application, potentially facilitating better land management practices that align with state forestry goals.

Summary

House Bill 6263, also known as the Act Concerning the Transition from the Ten Mill Program, modifies existing statutes relating to the taxation and classification of forest land in Connecticut. This bill aims to provide clarity on the classification of certain lands and the resultant tax implications for landowners. It seeks to replace and update sections within the general statutes concerning how woodland and timber-bearing land is assessed for tax purposes. Specifically, the bill delineates the criteria for classifying land as forest land and outlines the process for landowners who wish to convert their land for tax purposes without incurring penalties.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6263 appears generally positive, particularly among landowners and conservationists who favor enhanced clarity and support for land preservation efforts. While the specific discussions within legislative settings were not noted, amendments aimed at promoting proper land classification typically garner broad support as they resonate with both ecological preservation and economic interests. However, some apprehensions could arise over ensuring that tax classifications do not inadvertently penalize landowners or inhibit local land use practices.

Contention

While there are no major points of contention noted in the discussions surrounding HB 6263, the bill’s progression may prompt debates about balancing tax incentives with environmental sustainability. Stakeholders may have differing views on the implications of graduated yield taxes and their potential effects on timber production and land conversion practices. It is crucial that the local governments and assessors consider community-specific contexts while enforcing new classifications and tax structures to avoid unintended consequences.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1691

Education finance: Classified School and Community College Employee Summer Assistance Programs.

CA AB378

Education finance: Classified School Employee Summer Assistance Program.

CA AB621

Classified employees: Classified School Employees Summer Furlough Fund.

CA SJR2

Classified workers’ rights.

CA SB1177

Firearms: transfers.

CA AB670

Classified employees: part-time playground positions.

CA AB2160

Classified employees: school and community college districts: part-time playground positions.

CA AB1273

Classified employees: Classified Employee Staffing Ratio Workgroup.