Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06290

Introduced
2/4/11  
Introduced
2/4/11  
Refer
2/4/11  
Refer
2/4/11  
Report Pass
2/24/11  
Report Pass
2/24/11  
Refer
3/7/11  
Refer
3/7/11  
Report Pass
3/14/11  
Report Pass
3/14/11  
Refer
3/22/11  
Report Pass
4/7/11  
Engrossed
4/13/11  
Report Pass
4/14/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning Economic Development Programs For Certain Aerospace And Defense Plants.

Impact

The measure is designed primarily to assist municipalities that have historically been reliant on defense contracts and defense-related employment. By updating the definitions and criteria for what constitutes a manufacturing facility, the bill provides much-needed support for areas experiencing economic downturns as a result of reduced defense spending. This could lead to job creation, an increase in manufacturing prospects, and a bolstering of local economies that have suffered job losses due to facility closures.

Summary

House Bill 06290 aims to enhance economic development opportunities for specific aerospace and defense facilities that have been significantly impacted by contract cuts or closures. By redefining certain business facilities as 'manufacturing facilities,' the bill intends to streamline access to various state tax incentives and economic development programs, specifically for those located in municipalities facing severe economic challenges due to the aforementioned issues. This modification in designation allows businesses that might not traditionally qualify for such incentives to receive support, thereby potentially revitalizing struggling regions.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 06290 appears to be robustly supportive, with considerable backing from both lawmakers who recognize the need for support in distressed municipalities and local business leaders eager to capitalize on new opportunities. There has been a lack of substantial opposition, though some critics express concern over the long-term sustainability of relying on defense sector activities for economic growth.

Contention

Concerns have been raised regarding the potential for misallocation of resources if newly designated facilities do not lead to sustained economic development. The primary contention revolves around ensuring that state incentives lead to actual job creation rather than temporary fixes for businesses that might continue to depend on the fluctuating aerospace and defense sectors. Additionally, the effectiveness of the program in genuinely revitalizing economically lagging areas remains an ongoing discussion point among stakeholders.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.