Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06303

Introduced
2/7/11  
Introduced
2/7/11  
Refer
2/7/11  
Refer
2/7/11  
Report Pass
3/7/11  
Report Pass
3/7/11  
Refer
3/21/11  
Refer
3/21/11  
Report Pass
3/28/11  
Report Pass
3/28/11  
Refer
4/6/11  
Refer
4/6/11  
Report Pass
4/8/11  
Refer
4/13/11  
Refer
5/4/11  
Report Pass
5/9/11  
Report Pass
5/9/11  
Engrossed
5/17/11  
Engrossed
5/17/11  
Report Pass
5/19/11  
Chaptered
6/21/11  
Chaptered
6/21/11  
Enrolled
6/24/11  
Enrolled
6/24/11  
Passed
7/8/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Treatment Of Ill And Injured Animals In Municipal Animal Shelters.

Impact

The enactment of HB 6303 is expected to enhance the standards of care for animals held in municipal dog pounds. By facilitating contracts between municipal shelters and animal rescue organizations, the bill promotes immediate access to necessary veterinary services. This means that animals in need of care are less likely to face delays in treatment, which can improve overall outcomes for animal health. Additionally, the legislation outlines a procedure for individuals to report neglect or inadequate care, ensuring greater accountability for animal control officers and facilities.

Summary

House Bill 6303, also known as the Act Concerning the Treatment of Ill and Injured Animals in Municipal Animal Shelters, aims to improve the treatment of animals within municipal and regional animal control systems. This legislation allows dog pound facilities to enter into contracts with nonprofit animal rescue organizations for providing veterinary care to injured, sick, or diseased animals. Importantly, the bill ensures that the costs associated with such veterinary care do not fall on the municipalities, thereby alleviating financial burdens on local governments.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6303 appears to be strongly positive among animal welfare advocates and organizations, as they perceive the bill as a significant step forward in advocating for the rights and welfare of animals in municipal care. Stakeholders generally express support for the increased emphasis on proper veterinary treatment and governance, viewing it as a necessary evolution in how communities manage and care for strays and impounded animals. However, it is essential to recognize that supporters of municipal cost control may have concerns regarding future financial obligations stemming from increased vetting and regulations under this bill.

Contention

Despite the positive reception, there could be some points of contention, particularly regarding the implementation of these contracts and the operational dynamics between municipal shelters and animal rescue groups. Questions may arise about the eligibility criteria for rescue organizations, the qualifications of veterinary professionals chosen for treatment, and potential liabilities. The bill's provisions may also face scrutiny from municipalities regarding the responsibilities placed on them concerning oversight and compliance with the standards set forth in the legislation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

SC H3223

Telehealth for Veterinary Services

AL SB185

Veterinary medicine; veterinarian-client-patient relationship further provided; refilling prescription regulations; relationship shared among a location, provided

MI HB4200

Health occupations: veterinarians; veterinarian-client-patient relationship; require. Amends secs. 16287, 18811 & 18814 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.16287 et seq.) & adds sec. 18818.

AZ SB1401

Animal acupuncture; certification; requirements

CA AB1399

Veterinary medicine: veterinarian-client-patient relationship: telehealth.

CA SB669

Veterinarians: veterinarian-client-patient relationship.

CA SB602

Veterinarians: veterinarian-client-patient-relationship.

CA AB814

Veterinary medicine: animal physical rehabilitation.