Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06351

Introduced
2/16/11  
Introduced
2/16/11  
Refer
2/16/11  
Refer
2/16/11  
Report Pass
3/15/11  
Report Pass
3/15/11  
Refer
3/24/11  
Refer
3/24/11  
Report Pass
3/30/11  
Report Pass
3/30/11  
Refer
5/26/11  
Refer
5/26/11  
Report Pass
5/31/11  
Report Pass
5/31/11  
Engrossed
6/2/11  
Engrossed
6/2/11  
Report Pass
6/3/11  
Chaptered
6/28/11  
Enrolled
6/30/11  
Enrolled
6/30/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning Foreclosure Mediation And Assistance Programs, The Highly Compensated Employee Exemption For Mortgage Loan Originators, General-use Prepaid Cards And Neighborhood Protection.

Impact

Upon enactment, HB06351 will significantly alter the manner in which foreclosure actions are conducted in Connecticut. It requires mortgagees to notify mortgagors of their rights to participate in foreclosure mediation before any judgments can be entered against them. This process is designed to afford homeowners with a structured method to explore alternatives to foreclosure, thus striving to mitigate the adverse impact of foreclosures on families and communities. Furthermore, it modifies existing regulations concerning mortgage loan originators by instituting new exemptions under certain conditions, potentially impacting compensation structures within the mortgage industry.

Summary

House Bill 06351 seeks to address issues related to foreclosure mediation, mortgage loan originators, general-use prepaid cards, and neighborhood protection within the state. Primarily, it establishes guidelines for foreclosure mediation programs aimed at resolving disputes between mortgagees and mortgagors before foreclosures are finalized. By instituting these programs, the bill aims to provide an opportunity for affected homeowners to negotiate solutions such as mortgage debt restructuring or assistance through community resources.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB06351 is mixed, reflecting ongoing concerns about the balance between the rights of mortgagees and the protections required for mortgagors. Supporters argue that enhanced mediation opportunities can lead to fairer outcomes and promote stability in residential communities by helping homeowners retain their properties. Conversely, some express apprehension that the bill may impose undue burdens on lenders and delay necessary foreclosure proceedings, especially in cases where borrowers are unlikely to meet their payment obligations.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB06351 include the potential for increased regulatory oversight and the nature of protections granted to tenants in properties undergoing foreclosure. Critics argue that while mediation is beneficial, it could also prolong the process, leading to uncertainty for both lenders and borrowers. Additionally, discussions around how the bill affects general-use prepaid cards and various neighborhood protection initiatives have sparked debate about the broader implications of such provisions on consumer rights and local governance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB05369

An Act Concerning Foreclosure Mediation.

CT HB05270

An Act Concerning Foreclosure Mediation.

CT HB06419

An Act Extending The Foreclosure Mediation Program.

CT HB06355

An Act Concerning Homeowner Protection Rights.

CT HB05410

An Act Concerning Modifications To The Foreclosure Mediation Program.

CT HB06752

An Act Extending The Foreclosure Mediation Program.

CT HB06996

An Act Extending The Ezequiel Santiago Foreclosure Mediation Program Until June 30, 2023.

CT HB05567

An Act Concerning Alternatives To Foreclosures, The Foreclosure Mediation Program, And The Mortgagor In Good Standing Statutes.