Connecticut House Bill HB06384

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/17/11
• Refer: 2/17/11
• Report Pass: 3/17/11
• Refer: 3/25/11
• Report Pass: 3/31/11

Caption

An Act Increasing The Registration Fees For The Labor Department's Apprenticeship Program.

Impact

This legislation is expected to generate additional revenue for the Labor Department, which could enhance the administration and effectiveness of the apprenticeship program. The fees collected will be split between the state's General Fund and a nonlapsing appropriation specific to the apprenticeship program. This financial adjustment seeks to ensure that the program can sustain itself while potentially expanding its reach and effectiveness in workforce training and development.

Summary

House Bill 6384 aims to increase the registration fees associated with the Labor Department's apprenticeship program. Under the current law, apprentices who registered before July 1, 2003, pay a nominal fee of twenty-five dollars, while new apprentices are required to pay significantly higher fees depending on their registration date. The bill proposes to establish a tiered fee structure, whereby new registrants would pay one hundred fifteen dollars for initial registration and for annual renewals. These changes intend to align the costs with the real expenses incurred by the Labor Department in administering the apprenticeship program.

Sentiment

General sentiment around the bill appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that the increased fees are a necessary adjustment to maintain a high-quality apprenticeship program that meets current economic demands. They emphasize the importance of investing in workforce development to enhance job readiness among apprentices. In contrast, opponents may contend that raising fees could deter potential apprentices from entering the program, thus limiting access to important training and job opportunities.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns from various stakeholders about the impact of increased fees on participation rates in the apprenticeship program. Critics worry that this financial burden might disproportionately affect individuals from lower-income backgrounds, undermining the program's goal to provide equitable training opportunities. Furthermore, the debate highlights the balance between generating revenue for state programs and maintaining accessibility for all potential apprentices.