Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06412

Introduced
2/17/11  
Introduced
2/17/11  
Refer
2/17/11  
Refer
2/17/11  
Report Pass
3/7/11  
Report Pass
3/7/11  
Refer
3/18/11  
Refer
3/18/11  
Report Pass
3/24/11  
Report Pass
3/24/11  
Engrossed
5/19/11  
Engrossed
5/19/11  
Report Pass
5/23/11  
Report Pass
5/23/11  
Chaptered
6/21/11  
Chaptered
6/21/11  
Enrolled
6/24/11  
Enrolled
6/24/11  
Passed
7/8/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Small Town Economic Assistance Program.

Impact

The implementation of HB 6412 will likely affect state regulations surrounding municipal funding and support. The restrictions placed on municipalities in terms of eligibility ensure that the program targets communities that possess certain economic characteristics, aiming to uplift those that may be lagging in terms of resources and investment. By mandating that groups of municipalities cannot exceed the financial thresholds specified in the bill, the legislation seeks to promote equitable distribution of financial aid among various localities.

Summary

House Bill 6412, also known as the Small Town Economic Assistance Program, is designed to provide financial assistance to municipalities in Connecticut that do not fall under the category of economically distressed cities. The program focuses on offering grants-in-aid to eligible municipalities or groups thereof, with a cap of five hundred thousand dollars per municipality per fiscal year. This bill aims to enhance the capacity of smaller towns to undertake local projects, fostering economic growth and sustainability.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6412 appears to be generally positive among local government representatives and constituents who favor economic assistance for small towns. Supporters argue that the program will enable municipalities to address specific challenges and execute necessary projects that might otherwise go unfunded. However, some concerns may arise regarding the adequacy of funding and whether the program reaches all intended beneficiaries effectively, particularly in light of the restrictions on economically distressed municipalities.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the bill's criteria for eligibility, as some stakeholders may argue that the definition of economically distressed or public investment communities could exclude towns that need help but do not meet the specified thresholds. Additionally, there may be discussions on the allocation process of these grants and whether funding caps may hinder larger municipal projects. Overall, while the intention behind the bill is commendable, its execution and reach are areas of scrutiny.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.