Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06470

Introduced
2/24/11  
Introduced
2/24/11  
Refer
2/24/11  
Refer
2/24/11  
Report Pass
3/17/11  
Report Pass
3/17/11  
Refer
3/25/11  
Refer
3/25/11  

Caption

An Act Requiring The Insurance Department To Study And Report On The National Association Of Insurance Commissioners' Interstate Insurance Product Regulation Compact.

Impact

The bill's analysis will explore potential changes in the regulatory framework governing insurance products, which may lead to significant shifts in local market dynamics. It is intended to ultimately provide insights into how such an interstate agreement could streamline the approval processes for new insurance products and enhance consumer protection mechanisms. The expected outcome is a more cohesive regulatory environment that could benefit consumers by introducing more innovative products in a timely manner.

Summary

House Bill 06470 mandates the Insurance Department to conduct a comprehensive study on the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' Interstate Insurance Product Regulation Compact. The bill aims to analyze how joining this compact could affect the insurance market in the state, specifically regarding product innovation, development timelines, and consumer protections. By requiring a report by January 1, 2012, the bill seeks to facilitate informed discussions about the implications of regulatory participation on both the state level and the consumer market.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 06470 reflects a proactive approach towards modernization of insurance regulations. Stakeholders who support the bill perceive it as a crucial step towards keeping up with evolving insurance markets and ensuring consumer interests are safeguarded. However, there may be concerns from individuals advocating for stricter local regulations, which worry that the compact could diminish state-specific protections by aligning too closely with potentially broader federal standards.

Contention

Key points of contention may arise regarding the balance between regulatory uniformity and local consumer protections. Critics could argue that the analysis proposed in the bill may overlook unique regional insurance challenges or fail to address local insurance products that cater to specific demographics. Ultimately, the bill opens the door to debates about the role of state agencies in maintaining robust consumer protections while integrating more streamlined interstate regulations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.