Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06482

Introduced
2/24/11  
Introduced
2/24/11  
Refer
2/24/11  
Refer
2/24/11  
Report Pass
3/11/11  
Report Pass
3/11/11  
Report Pass
3/18/11  
Report Pass
3/18/11  
Refer
3/31/11  
Refer
3/31/11  
Report Pass
4/6/11  
Report Pass
4/6/11  
Refer
4/12/11  
Refer
4/12/11  
Report Pass
4/18/11  

Caption

An Act Authorizing The Department Of Transportation To Conduct A Pilot Project Based On Design-build And Other Alternative Contracting Methods.

Impact

If enacted, the bill would enable the DOT to experiment with innovative contracting techniques, moving away from traditional bidding processes. It would require the department to submit proposals for each pilot project to the relevant legislative committee before starting the project. This oversight would facilitate legislative engagement and ensure accountability in the execution of these alternative methods. The anticipated impact could lead to improved project outcomes and greater satisfaction among stakeholders involved in transportation construction.

Summary

House Bill 6482 aims to authorize the Department of Transportation (DOT) to conduct a pilot project utilizing design-build and other alternative contracting methods for construction projects. By adopting this approach, the bill seeks to streamline project delivery in the state, potentially enhancing efficiency and reducing project costs. The intent is to evaluate these methods' effectiveness in delivering transportation projects within the criteria of timeliness, cost, and quality, as the bill mandates a detailed evaluation following project completion.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 6482 appears to be cautiously optimistic. Supporters believe that by allowing the DOT to explore new methodologies, the bill could pave the way for more effective use of taxpayer funds in infrastructure projects. Stakeholders in the construction industry may view this as a positive shift, offering opportunities for growth and innovation. However, concerns about the pilot's scope and potential pitfalls of alternative methods remain, emphasizing the need for careful monitoring and evaluation.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding the bill includes the apprehension that pilot projects could lead to unforeseen complications if not carefully managed. Critics may argue that without robust regulatory frameworks, alternative contracting could compromise project quality or oversight. Additionally, there may be discussions about how these methods will integrate into existing frameworks and whether they will advantage certain contractors over others. Engagement with stakeholders is critical to mitigate these concerns as the bill moves forward.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.