Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06631

Introduced
3/24/11  
Introduced
3/24/11  
Refer
3/24/11  
Refer
3/24/11  
Report Pass
4/12/11  
Report Pass
4/12/11  
Refer
4/20/11  
Refer
4/20/11  
Report Pass
4/27/11  
Report Pass
4/27/11  
Refer
5/4/11  
Refer
5/4/11  
Report Pass
5/11/11  
Report Pass
5/11/11  
Engrossed
6/2/11  
Engrossed
6/2/11  
Report Pass
6/3/11  
Report Pass
6/3/11  
Chaptered
6/21/11  
Chaptered
6/21/11  
Enrolled
6/24/11  
Enrolled
6/24/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Creation Of A Replacement Birth Certificate Pursuant To A Gestational Agreement.

Impact

This legislation significantly impacts state laws by allowing the recognition of intended parents in cases of gestational surrogacy, which has historically been a contentious legal area. By providing clarity on the issuance of birth certificates in these instances, the bill seeks to streamline processes for families involved in assisted reproduction. It fortifies the legal parentage rights of individuals who enter into gestational agreements, thereby enhancing their ability to establish parenthood from the moment of birth. This advancement is particularly important as more individuals and couples seek alternative family-building methods.

Summary

House Bill 06631, known as an Act Concerning The Creation Of A Replacement Birth Certificate Pursuant To A Gestational Agreement, aims to establish procedures regarding the issuance of replacement birth certificates for children conceived through gestational agreements. The bill stipulates that following a court order recognizing a gestational agreement, the Department of Public Health will create an updated birth certificate naming the intended parents rather than the surrogate mother, thereby addressing issues of parental rights and child identity at birth.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB06631 appears largely supportive among stakeholders involved in assisted reproduction and advocacy groups that promote family rights and surrogacy arrangements. However, some concerns have been raised by entities focused on child welfare and rights, urging that careful consideration be given to the implications of such agreements. Overall, the bill has garnered positive feedback for its intent to simplify legal processes and protect the rights of intended parents, which is viewed as a progressive step in family law.

Contention

While the bill is largely seen as beneficial, it does face contention regarding potential oversights in ensuring the welfare of children born through gestational agreements, especially regarding the surrogate mothers' rights and the complexities surrounding parental acknowledgment. Critics argue that a thorough framework needs to be established to ensure that all parties' rights are respected and protected throughout the gestational process, to avoid issues of exploitation or misunderstanding in these complex family dynamics.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB999

Mobilehome park residencies: rent control: exemption: COVID-19.

CA AB1345

Residential Exclusive Listing Agreements Act.

CA AB1380

Premarital agreements: enforcement.

CA AB2517

Water: irrigation districts: long-term maintenance agreements.

WV SB453

Establishing uniform requirements for restrictive employment agreements

CA AB1023

Ronald Reagan Day: state holiday.

CA AB1972

Income share agreements: postsecondary training: gross income exclusion.

TX SB1052

Relating to certain retail installment contracts and leases for vehicles; providing for a civil penalty.