Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00168

Introduced
1/18/11  
Introduced
1/18/11  
Refer
1/18/11  
Refer
1/18/11  
Refer
2/1/11  
Refer
2/1/11  
Report Pass
3/15/11  
Report Pass
3/15/11  
Refer
3/25/11  
Refer
3/25/11  
Report Pass
3/31/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning Late Fees For Personal Risk Insurance Policies.

Impact

The enactment of SB00168 is set to modify existing legislation impacting personal risk insurance policies in the state. By imposing limits on late fees and requiring clear communication from insurers, the bill aims to create a fairer environment for consumers, especially those who may face financial challenges in making timely payments. This aligns with increased consumer protection efforts in the insurance sector, addressing the need for more equitable treatment of policyholders.

Summary

Senate Bill 00168 focuses on regulating late fees associated with personal risk insurance policies. This legislation mandates that insurers must disclose late fee amounts and their applicability clearly on billing statements. Furthermore, it establishes that late fees should not exceed twenty-five dollars and grants policyholders a grace period of no less than ten days to make their payments before a late fee is applied. The intent is to ensure transparency and provide policyholders with adequate time to fulfill their payment obligations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill seems to be generally positive among consumer advocacy groups, which view the changes as a step forward in protecting consumers from potentially exploitative practices regarding late payments. There appears to be support for the bill that highlights the importance of fiscal responsibility among insurers and the need for policies that consider the consumers' perspective. Insurers might have mixed feelings, as while the bill may promote fairness, it could also limit revenue opportunities through late fees.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise regarding the cap on late fees and the imposed grace period. Some industry representatives may argue that such restrictions could lead to financial losses and reduced flexibility in managing insurance accounts. Conversely, supporters of the bill stress that preventing excessive late fees is fundamental to consumer protection and allows for more manageable financial planning for policyholders.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.