Connecticut Senate Bill SB00288

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/20/11
• Refer: 1/20/11
• Refer: 2/7/11

Caption

An Act Requiring A Study Of The Delivery Of Information Technology Services To Public Institutions Of Higher Education.

Impact

The bill, upon enactment, empowers the Department of Information Technology to thoroughly analyze the effectiveness and efficiency of IT service delivery to higher education institutions. It calls for the Commissioner of Information Technology to present a report to the relevant legislative committee by January 1, 2012. This report is expected to yield insights and practical recommendations that would influence future state policies and appropriations regarding technology services within the educational sector.

Summary

SB00288, introduced during the January Session of 2011, mandates a comprehensive study of the delivery of information technology services to public institutions of higher education in Connecticut, specifically targeting community-technical colleges, the Connecticut State University System, and The University of Connecticut. The bill's primary aim is to evaluate the current state of IT service delivery within these institutions and identify potential efficiencies and improvements that could enhance their operations. The study is to be conducted by the Department of Information Technology.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be generally supportive, particularly among stakeholders who recognize the critical role of technology in modern education. Supporters argue that improving IT service delivery is essential for enhancing educational outcomes and operational efficiencies within public institutions. However, there may also be a cautious sentiment from some quarters regarding the allocation of resources and whether the study's insights will translate into actionable changes.

Contention

While SB00288 seems to enjoy broad support for its goals, potential points of contention could arise regarding the specifics of the study's parameters, the implementation of any recommended changes, and the associated costs. Critics might question the adequacy of funding for the study or fear that findings may not be reflected in actionable reforms. Additionally, ensuring equitable access to technology improvements for all public institutions could be a pivotal issue during discussion.