Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00362 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.
OldNewDifferences
11 General Assembly Proposed Bill No. 362
22 January Session, 2011 LCO No. 1454
33 Referred to Committee on Labor and Public Employees
44 Introduced by:
55 SEN. MCKINNEY, 28th Dist. SEN. FASANO, 34th Dist. REP. CAFERO, 142nd Dist. REP. CANDELORA, 86th Dist. REP. KLARIDES, 114th Dist.
66
77 General Assembly
88
99 Proposed Bill No. 362
1010
1111 January Session, 2011
1212
1313 LCO No. 1454
1414
1515 Referred to Committee on Labor and Public Employees
1616
1717 Introduced by:
1818
1919 SEN. MCKINNEY, 28th Dist.
2020
2121 SEN. FASANO, 34th Dist.
2222
2323 REP. CAFERO, 142nd Dist.
2424
2525 REP. CANDELORA, 86th Dist.
2626
2727 REP. KLARIDES, 114th Dist.
2828
2929 AN ACT CONCERNING MUNICIPAL BUDGET RESERVE BALANCES AND MUNICIPAL ARBITRATION REFORM.
3030
3131 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:
3232
3333 That subdivision (9) of subsection (d) of section 7-473c of the general statutes be amended to provide that municipal budget reserve fund balances of ten per cent or less shall not be considered by the arbitration panel in calculating the financial capability of a municipality; and further, authorize a municipality to reject an arbitration award by a vote of two-thirds of the members of its legislative body and to provide that any such rejected award shall be subject to contract negotiations rather than a second arbitration, except that if no agreement is reached by the date forty-five days after the date of such rejection, parties shall submit to final and binding arbitration.
3434
3535 Statement of Purpose:
3636
3737 To provide municipalities with tools to address local budget deficits and restore balance to the binding arbitration process by making it consistent with the state binding arbitration process.