Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01024

Introduced
2/17/11  
Introduced
2/17/11  
Refer
2/17/11  
Refer
2/17/11  
Report Pass
3/22/11  
Report Pass
3/22/11  
Refer
4/1/11  
Report Pass
4/7/11  
Report Pass
4/7/11  
Engrossed
6/7/11  
Engrossed
6/7/11  
Report Pass
6/7/11  

Caption

An Act Modernizing The State's Telecommunications Laws.

Impact

The impact of SB01024 on state laws includes significant changes to how telecommunications services are classified and regulated. The bill grants the state authority to reclassify services and remove outdated regulations that hinder competition. This shift is crucial for fostering an environment where multiple providers can compete effectively, which could lead to improved services and lower prices for consumers. Additionally, by reducing monopolistic practices, the bill aims to promote innovation in the telecommunications sector, aligning with the goal of keeping pace with advancements in technology.

Summary

Substitute Bill No. 1024, titled 'An Act Modernizing The State's Telecommunications Laws', aims to update and reform Connecticut's existing telecommunications regulations. The bill seeks to encourage competition within the telecommunications market while safeguarding consumer interests. One of the key provisions allows the Department of Public Utility Control to regulate telecommunications services, classifying them as competitive or non-competitive based on market conditions. This reform intends to reflect the rapidly evolving nature of telecommunications technology and market dynamics while ensuring consumers receive fair treatment from service providers.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB01024 is generally positive among proponents who view it as a necessary update to outdated laws. Supporters argue that it is essential for stimulating competition and providing consumers with more and better choices in telecommunications services. However, there are concerns expressed by some consumer advocacy groups regarding the implications of deregulating certain aspects and the potential risk of service providers diminishing service quality for profit. These conflicting views reveal a nuanced debate between the necessity for modernization of laws and the responsibility to protect consumers.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB01024 include the concerns about consumer protections as regulators relinquish certain controls to promote competition. Critics worry that this could lead to a decrease in service reliability or equity, particularly in underserved areas. Additionally, the reclassification of services as competitive may affect the pricing strategies of telecommunications companies, which could either benefit or disadvantage consumers depending on the companies' market dominance. The bill emphasizes the need for ongoing oversight to ensure that the interests of consumers remain a priority in an increasingly competitive telecommunications landscape.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB06402

An Act Modernizing The State's Telecommunications Laws.

CT SB00447

An Act Modernizing The State's Telecommunications Laws.

CT SB00330

An Act Concerning The Regulation Of Voice Service Providers.

CT SB00847

An Act Concerning The Regulation Of Voice Service Providers.

CT HB05311

An Act Concerning Telecommunications Provider Tariffs For Services Offered To Business Retail End Users And Certain Telecommunications Service-related Reports.

NJ A500

Requires telecommunications companies to provide prorated refunds for service outages of longer than 72 hours.

CT SB00545

An Act Concerning The Satisfaction Of Telecommunications Quality Of Service Standards And Prohibiting Remote Reconnection Fees.

UT SB0269

Telecommunications Amendments