Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01160

Introduced
3/10/11  
Introduced
3/10/11  
Refer
3/10/11  
Refer
3/10/11  
Report Pass
3/25/11  
Report Pass
3/25/11  
Refer
4/7/11  
Refer
4/7/11  
Report Pass
4/13/11  
Report Pass
4/13/11  
Refer
4/27/11  
Refer
4/27/11  
Report Pass
5/4/11  
Report Pass
5/4/11  
Report Pass
5/5/11  
Report Pass
5/5/11  
Refer
5/11/11  
Refer
5/11/11  
Report Pass
5/17/11  
Report Pass
5/17/11  
Report Pass
5/18/11  
Report Pass
5/18/11  
Engrossed
6/7/11  
Engrossed
6/7/11  
Report Pass
6/7/11  
Report Pass
6/7/11  
Chaptered
6/29/11  
Chaptered
6/29/11  
Enrolled
6/30/11  
Enrolled
6/30/11  
Passed
7/13/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning Revisions To The Statutes Regarding The Minimum Budget Requirement And Charter School Educator Permit.

Impact

The proposed revisions to the minimum budget requirement could significantly impact the financial landscape for local school districts. Specifically, districts facing decreasing student populations will have the flexibility to lower their budgeted appropriations accordingly, which proponents argue could help them manage their finances more effectively during challenging fiscal periods. However, these changes also raise concerns about potential negative effects on the quality of education if funding is reduced in districts already struggling to maintain adequate educational services.

Summary

SB01160, also known as the Act Concerning Revisions To The Statutes Regarding The Minimum Budget Requirement And Charter School Educator Permit, seeks to modify the existing provisions governing education funding and the regulations surrounding charter schools in the state. The bill introduces changes that affect the minimum budget requirement for education, allowing districts to reduce their educational budget in certain scenarios, particularly in response to declining student enrollment.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB01160 is mixed. Supporters, including many educational administrators, view the bill as a necessary adjustment that offers flexibility to adapt to real-world student enrollment fluctuations. Critics, however, fear that the bill undermines the commitment to stable educational funding, potentially jeopardizing resources available to students in affected districts. This reflects broader tensions in educational policy regarding fiscal responsibility versus the need to ensure quality in education.

Contention

There are notable points of contention in the discussions involving SB01160, particularly regarding the balance between reducing budgets in response to enrollment changes and maintaining adequate funding levels to ensure quality education. Opponents argue that the modifications could disproportionately impact lower-income districts that are already facing challenges, while supporters focus on the need for adaptive financial strategies. The bill also addresses regulations around charter school educator permits, creating pathways for educators to gain certification under specific conditions, which has generated debate about the standards for teacher qualifications in charter schools.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB07023

An Act Concerning Various Revisions And Additions To The Education Statutes.

NJ A5193

Permits high performing school districts to be monitored by DOE under New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum (NJ QSAC) every seven years rather than every three years.

NJ A3315

Eliminates partial and full State intervention under New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum.

NJ A3261

Eliminates partial and full State intervention under New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum.

MN SF2255

Omnibus E-12 Education appropriations

MN HF2433

Education finance bill.

CT SB01138

An Act Concerning The Strengthening Of School Bullying Laws.

MO SB542

Repeals provisions relating to the statewide assessment system