Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01184

Introduced
3/16/11  
Introduced
3/16/11  
Refer
3/16/11  
Refer
3/16/11  
Report Pass
3/28/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning Health Care Facilities.

Impact

If enacted, SB01184 would significantly affect state laws governing health care facilities by granting broader enforcement powers to the Commissioner of Public Health. The bill stipulates that civil penalties can reach up to $25,000 for hospitals and $3,000 for other covered institutions for non-compliance. This could heighten the accountability of health care institutions, as non-compliant facilities would face financial repercussions, promoting an atmosphere of compliance that could lead to improved patient care standards throughout the state.

Summary

SB01184, titled 'An Act Concerning Health Care Facilities,' aims to enhance the regulatory framework for health care facilities in the state. It gives the Commissioner of Public Health the authority to take emergency actions to protect patients in institutions deemed to pose a threat to health and safety. The bill allows for the imposition of civil penalties on hospitals and other facilities for violations related to health care operations, thereby enforcing stricter compliance with the Public Health Code and the State Fire Safety Code. The intent is to ensure that health care entities adhere to regulated standards for the safety and welfare of patients.

Sentiment

The reception of SB01184 has broadly echoed sentiments of support aimed at strengthening health care regulations to protect patients. Proponents argue that the increased enforcement capabilities are necessary to prevent lapses in care that jeopardize patient safety. Conversely, some stakeholders express reservations, fearing that such regulations might lead to an excessive burden on health care providers, especially smaller facilities that may struggle to meet stringent compliance standards and avoid financial penalties.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill include concerns about the potential for excessive punitive measures that might arise from the enforcement mechanisms. Critics argue that the bill's structure could lead to a disproportionate focus on penalties rather than enhancing collaborative compliance efforts between the state and health care facilities. This tension underscores a fundamental debate in health policy regarding the balance between regulation and support for service providers, with the need to ensure patient safety contrasting with the preservation of operational sustainability for health care providers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB05020

An Act Implementing The Governor's Budget Recommendations Regarding Public Health.

KS HB2235

Updating provisions of the technology-enabled fiduciary financial institutions (TEFFI) act by making the act part of the state banking code, adjusting and providing certain definitions, reducing the TEFFI charter application fee, authorizing the issuance of certificates and trust certificates, providing for the supervision of TEFFIs by the state bank commissioner and including Kansas nonprofit corporations as qualified charities for the TEFFI income tax credit.

CA AB38

Student loan servicers: licensing and regulation: Student Loan Servicing Act.

CA AB2839

California Financing Law: Pilot Program for Increased Access to Responsible Small Dollar Loans: monthly maintenance fees.

CA AB1177

California Public Banking Option Act.

OH SB74

Regards Treasurer of State and electronic payment of taxes

OH HB192

Regards Treasurer of State; electronic payment of taxes

MN HF779

Advance payment of the education credit established, education credit assignments disallowed, and report on delivering advance payments using an electronic benefits transfer card required.