Connecticut Senate Bill SB01188

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/16/11
• Refer: 3/16/11
• Report Pass: 3/30/11
• Refer: 4/11/11
• Report Pass: 4/18/11
• Refer: 4/27/11

Caption

An Act Establishing The Division Of Administrative Hearings.

Impact

The passage of SB01188 would have significant implications for state law by formalizing the structure and procedures associated with administrative hearings. The division would be tasked with conducting hearings in compliance with existing statutes and regulations, thereby ensuring that the rights of individuals and entities involved in contested cases are protected. Furthermore, by transferring the responsibility of these hearings to a specialized division, the bill aims to reduce the backlog of cases and improve the speed at which decisions are made, ultimately enhancing public trust in the administrative process.

Summary

SB01188, known as the Act Establishing the Division of Administrative Hearings, aims to create a dedicated division within the Department of Administrative Services to handle administrative hearings related to contested cases. This bill is designed to streamline the adjudication process by establishing impartial hearings that ensure that decisions regarding the legal rights and duties of parties in state matters are made fairly and efficiently. The establishment of this division reflects an attempt to enhance transparency and accountability within state agencies.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB01188 appears to be supportive from legislative discussions, with acknowledgment of the need for a more organized approach to handling administrative law matters. Advocates suggest that the establishment of a dedicated division will contribute positively to the efficiency and fairness of administrative proceedings. However, there are some concerns regarding the potential for bureaucratic hurdles or the adequacy of resources to ensure that the division functions effectively once established.

Contention

Notable points of contention around the bill include concerns regarding the selection and appointment of the Chief Administrative Law Adjudicator and the powers bestowed upon this position. Critics argue that since the Chief is appointed by the Governor, there is potential for political influence over the division’s operations. Additionally, there are discussions on whether this new administrative structure could unintentionally complicate existing legal processes rather than simplify them, particularly if communication between agencies and the division is not effectively managed.