Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01197

Introduced
3/16/11  
Refer
3/16/11  
Report Pass
4/1/11  
Refer
4/14/11  
Report Pass
4/20/11  
Report Pass
4/20/11  
Refer
5/11/11  
Refer
5/11/11  
Report Pass
5/16/11  
Report Pass
5/16/11  
Report Pass
5/17/11  

Caption

An Act Establishing A Legislative Code Of Conduct And House Of Representatives And Senate Bipartisan Committees On Ethics.

Impact

The legislation will require each member of the General Assembly to be familiar with and adhere to defined ethical standards. It establishes procedures for reporting and investigating alleged misconduct against legislators, mandating the formation of bipartisan ethics committees in both the Senate and House of Representatives. These committees will handle complaints, conduct preliminary and full investigations, and have the authority to recommend disciplinary actions ranging from reprimands to expulsion. The bill's enactment signifies a move towards greater accountability and ethical oversight within the state legislature.

Summary

SB01197, also known as An Act Establishing A Legislative Code of Conduct and House of Representatives and Senate Bipartisan Committees on Ethics, aims to create a code of conduct for members of the state legislature. The bill establishes explicit guidelines for acceptable behavior, requiring legislators to represent constituents diligently, maintain transparency, and treat others with respect. The code is intended to enhance the integrity of the legislature by informing members about ethical standards and the consequences of misconduct.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB01197 appears generally positive among supporters who advocate for higher ethical standards in government and increased public trust. Legislative members and ethics advocates have praised the establishment of a clear framework for ethical conduct and the formation of bipartisan committees. However, there may be concerns regarding the implementation of these standards and the potential for politicization of the ethics review process, which could lead to accusations of selective enforcement.

Contention

Some points of contention may arise related to the definition of misconduct and the processes for handling allegations against legislators. Critics may argue that the establishment of ethics committees could be used politically against opponents rather than for genuinely maintaining ethical standards. Additionally, the bill's impact on legislative dynamics, particularly around issues of transparency and member accountability, will likely be debated, as the effectiveness of these committees and the rigor of enforcement will be critical in determining the bill's overall success.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NH HB1682

Establishing the law enforcement conduct review committee in the New Hampshire police standards and training council and making an appropriation therefor.

NH SB456

Establishing a law enforcement conduct review committee in the police standards and training council and making an appropriation therefor.

CA AB2032

Legislature: misconduct records.

CA AB772

Legislature: misconduct records.

TX SB1763

Relating to the procedures of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct.

CA SB867

Legislative Counsel: workplace conduct services.

MD HB991

Baltimore City - Civilian Review Board and Police Accountability Board

CA AB1835

Legislative Counsel: workplace conduct services.