Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05130

Introduced
2/16/12  
Introduced
2/16/12  
Refer
2/16/12  
Refer
2/16/12  
Report Pass
3/23/12  
Report Pass
3/23/12  
Refer
4/5/12  
Refer
4/5/12  
Report Pass
4/12/12  
Report Pass
4/12/12  
Engrossed
5/9/12  
Engrossed
5/9/12  
Report Pass
5/9/12  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Dam Safety Program.

Impact

The legislation significantly impacts existing state laws regarding dam safety by repealing certain obsolete provisions and establishing more robust requirements for dam owners. Notably, it introduces the necessity for emergency action plans for high or significant hazard dams, which must be updated biennially and communicated to affected municipalities. This change emphasizes the state's commitment to proactive safety measures and addresses concerns about environmental impacts, ensuring that construction and maintenance align with state regulations on wetlands and watercourses.

Summary

House Bill 05130 focuses on improving the Dam Safety Program in Connecticut by establishing clear regulations regarding the construction, inspection, and maintenance of dams and similar structures. The bill mandates that all dams that could potentially harm life or property must be subject to strict oversight, including inspections by licensed professional engineers. This act aims to enhance public safety and environmental standards concerning dam structures within the state, ensuring they meet specific safety criteria to mitigate risks associated with dam failures.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 05130 is positive among proponents, who argue that it promotes public safety and environmental protection through improved regulatory measures. Supporters view the bill as a necessary response to past dam safety incidents and advocate for the stringent oversight it enforces. Conversely, some critics express concerns regarding the financial burden this might place on dam owners, particularly smaller entities, who may find the costs of compliance challenging.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill include discussions on the financial implications for dam owners, especially regarding the costs associated with required inspections and compliance with new regulations. Additionally, while there is broad support for increasing safety measures, fears remain that excessive regulation could lead to reduced private investment in dam infrastructure. The balance between ensuring safety and maintaining economic viability for infrastructure owners continues to be a critical aspect of discussions about the bill's provisions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2452

Structural Fumigation Enforcement Program.

NJ S4062

Requires DCA to review and amend State Uniform Construction Code concerning parking structures to address increased weight of electric vehicles.

CT HB06441

An Act Concerning The Dam Safety Program And Mosquito Control.

LA SB214

Provides relative to the unitization of ultra deep oil and gas structures. (8/15/11) (OR SEE FISC NOTE)

CA SB824

Insurers: declared disaster: homeowners’ insurance policies.

LA HB504

Provides relative to pooling of ultra deep drilling structures

LA SB469

Provides for pooling of ultra deep drilling structures. (8/1/12)

CT SB01012

An Act Concerning The Permitting Of Certain Coastal Structures By The Department Of Energy And Environmental Protection.