Connecticut House Bill HB05225

Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/22/12
• Refer: 2/22/12
• Report Pass: 3/16/12
• Refer: 3/26/12
• Report Pass: 4/2/12
• Engrossed: 4/11/12
• Report Pass: 4/13/12
• Chaptered: 5/8/12
• Enrolled: 5/9/12

Caption

An Act Concerning Security Deposits Of Senior Citizens And Persons With Disabilities In Public Housing.

Impact

By establishing a mandatory interest return on security deposits, HB05225 aims to provide greater financial security for seniors and disabled individuals who often face economic challenges. The change will impact statutes related to public housing management and the financial responsibilities of landlords towards their tenants in these demographics. It addresses the often precarious financial situations of the affected groups, thereby supporting the overall well-being of senior citizens and individuals with disabilities reliant on such housing.

Summary

House Bill 05225, titled 'An Act Concerning Security Deposits Of Senior Citizens And Persons With Disabilities In Public Housing,' seeks to amend existing regulations surrounding the return of security deposits in public housing settings specifically tailored for senior citizens and individuals with disabilities. The bill introduces requirements for housing authorities and community housing development corporations to return security deposits along with accrued interest when tenants have resided in the housing for a minimum of one year. The legislation directly aims to enhance the financial protections afforded to vulnerable populations in the state.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB05225 appears to be positive, with stakeholders emphasizing the necessity of ensuring that vulnerable groups are treated fairly and provided with suitable financial considerations. Supporters argue that this bill is a progressive step toward safeguarding the rights of the elderly and disabled in public housing, a demographic that frequently lacks adequate financial resources. The bill's aim to protect these groups' interests seems to resonate positively within legislative discourse.

Contention

While the sentiment is largely in favor of HB05225, there may be some contention regarding the financial implications for housing authorities. Opponents might raise concerns about the financial burden that such requirements could place on entities managing public housing, potentially leading to higher operational costs. The balance between ensuring tenant protection and maintaining viable housing operations is likely to be a key point of discussion among legislative committees as they deliberate on the bill.