Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05271

Introduced
2/23/12  
Refer
2/23/12  
Report Pass
3/9/12  
Refer
3/13/12  
Report Pass
3/20/12  
Refer
4/4/12  
Report Pass
4/10/12  
Refer
4/17/12  
Report Pass
4/20/12  
Engrossed
4/30/12  
Engrossed
4/30/12  
Report Pass
5/2/12  
Chaptered
5/30/12  
Chaptered
5/30/12  
Enrolled
5/31/12  
Enrolled
5/31/12  
Passed
6/15/12  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Siting Council.

Impact

If enacted, HB 05271 would significantly enhance the Siting Council's authority and responsibilities. It emphasizes the need for the council to determine a public need for telecommunications facilities before approving any applications. The bill also mandates that applicants must consult with affected municipalities and consider local concerns, which could lead to better integration of new facilities into existing communities and minimize adverse effects. Additionally, the bill aims to foster shared use of facilities to reduce proliferation in less populated areas, which could ultimately help manage urban sprawls and enhance resource efficiency.

Summary

House Bill 05271, titled 'An Act Concerning The Siting Council,' focuses on improving and clarifying the processes related to the siting of telecommunications facilities in the state. This bill seeks to establish a framework for the Connecticut Siting Council, ensuring that all applications for telecommunications infrastructure undergo thorough scrutiny concerning public benefits, environmental impacts, and community consultations. The bill outlines the conditions under which certificates for new facilities may be granted and includes provisions for the notification and consultation of local municipalities regarding proposed facilities.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 05271 appears to be generally supportive, especially among those advocating for greater community involvement in the siting process of telecommunications infrastructure. Proponents believe that by empowering local municipalities and making the process transparent, the bill will enhance public trust and address community concerns effectively. However, there are underlying tensions regarding the balance of interests; while advocates for infrastructure development may prioritize broader access to telecommunications, residents' fears about potential environmental or aesthetic impacts are a point of contention. This highlights the ongoing challenges of managing growth while respecting local governance.

Contention

Despite the overall support for HB 05271, some representatives have voiced concerns about the potential for delays in the approval process. The required consultations and investigations could lead to extended timelines for approval, which may disrupt plans for expanding telecommunications access in underserved areas. Moreover, there are questions about how effectively neighborhood concerns will be integrated into the decision-making process. Ensuring compliance with these new provisions may lead to legal disputes or delays, creating a need for clear guidelines on procedures to mitigate such issues while still protecting community interests.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AZ SB1523

School districts; aggregate expenditure limitation

AZ HB2507

School districts; expenditure limitation

AZ HB2688

School districts; expenditure limitation

AZ SB1636

School districts; aggregate expenditure limitation

AZ HB2148

School districts; expenditure limitation

AZ SB1042

School districts; aggregate expenditure limitation

AZ SB1018

School districts; aggregate expenditure limitation

CA AB397

Unemployment insurance: benefits: disqualification: notice.