Connecticut House Bill HB05324

Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/12
• Refer: 2/28/12
• Report Pass: 3/13/12

Caption

An Act Concerning Child Safety By Restricting The Placement Of Leghold Traps.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would amend Section 26-72 of the General Statutes, establishing new standards for trapping fur-bearing animals. It would effectively limit the legal placement of leghold traps, altering current trapping practices significantly. While the regulations would continue to allow trapping for legitimate agricultural purposes, they would impose stricter controls on where and how traps can be used, which could impact local wildlife management efforts and recreational trapping.

Summary

House Bill 05324 aims to enhance child safety by imposing restrictions on the placement of leghold traps throughout Connecticut. The bill specifically prohibits setting these traps within a 750-foot radius of schools, daycare centers, public parks, and other designated public areas. This legislative intent is to mitigate the risk of accidental harm to children and non-target animals, thereby promoting a safer environment in areas where children commonly play and gather.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 05324 appears to lean towards concern for child safety and animal welfare among supporters, consisting of various advocacy groups and individuals prioritizing safety and humane treatment of animals. However, there may be opposing views from certain segments of the trapping community who view the restrictions as overreach or a hindrance to traditional trapping practices. This dual sentiment illustrates a conflict between community safety and individual rights to use land for trapping.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the debate over the balance between child safety and the rights of trappers. Advocates for the bill emphasize the protection of children and non-target wildlife, while critics argue that such measures may inhibit legitimate trapping practices that are important for wildlife management and cultural traditions. The implications of this bill highlight the ongoing conversations about wildlife conservation, public safety, and the regulation of individual rights.