Connecticut House Bill HB05342

Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/29/12
• Refer: 2/29/12
• Report Pass: 3/27/12
• Refer: 4/9/12
• Report Pass: 4/16/12
• Refer: 4/20/12
• Report Pass: 4/23/12
• Engrossed: 5/8/12
• Report Pass: 5/9/12
• Chaptered: 5/30/12
• Enrolled: 6/1/12
• Passed: 6/15/12

Caption

An Act Concerning Revisions To The State's Brownfield Remediation And Development Statutes.

Impact

The bill is set to positively impact state laws regarding environmental cleanup and property redevelopment. It outlines specific criteria for liability relief for property owners participating in the state’s brownfield remediation program, which could lead to increased private sector investment and job creation in distressed areas of the state. In addition, the changes to the funding mechanisms for the remediation efforts aim to provide more resources for local communities, enhancing their capacity to manage brownfield sites effectively.

Summary

House Bill 5342, titled 'An Act Concerning Revisions to the State's Brownfield Remediation and Development Statutes,' aims to enhance the effectiveness of the brownfield remediation program in Connecticut. The bill introduces several provisions designed to streamline processes for entities seeking to remediate contaminated properties and develop these sites for productive use. By clarifying liability protections for eligible parties involved in property ownership transfers, the legislation intends to encourage investment and redevelopment in historically contaminated areas, thus facilitating economic growth and improving environmental quality.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 5342 is largely positive, especially among proponents who view it as a vital step forward in addressing environmental hazards and stimulating local economies. Supporters, including environmental advocates and economic developers, believe that expanding the brownfield remediation program will promote healthier communities and catalyze revitalization efforts. However, concerns have been raised about the adequacy of protections for local interests, which suggests an undercurrent of caution among critics of the bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions about HB 5342 focus on the balance between encouraging development and ensuring adequate environmental protections. Some opponents express apprehension that the bill may inadvertently enable developers to sidestep responsibilities related to contamination, which could pose risks to public health and safety. As such, the dialogue surrounding the bill reflects broader themes of economic development versus environmental stewardship, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of both developmental incentives and community safety.