Connecticut House Bill HB05344

Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/29/12
• Refer: 2/29/12
• Report Pass: 3/22/12
• Refer: 4/2/12
• Report Pass: 4/10/12
• Engrossed: 5/2/12
• Report Pass: 5/3/12
• Chaptered: 5/30/12
• Enrolled: 5/31/12
• Passed: 6/15/12

Caption

An Act Concerning Streamlining The State's Stormwater General Permitting Process.

Impact

The bill impacts state laws by enabling a more centralized and simplified approach to regulating stormwater discharges. By establishing general permits, it eliminates the burden on entities that previously needed to navigate the more complex individual permit process. This is particularly relevant given the increasing concerns over water pollution and the management of stormwater runoff, thereby aligning state practices more closely with federal regulations while fostering a proactive stance on environmental protection.

Summary

House Bill 05344, known as 'An Act Concerning Streamlining The State's Stormwater General Permitting Process', aims to simplify the permitting process for stormwater discharges in Connecticut. The bill allows for the issuance of general permits that can cover multiple similar discharge categories, which streamlines the regulatory process and reduces the need for individual permits for each discharge. This change is intended to help municipalities and businesses comply with environmental regulations more efficiently, promoting better management of stormwater resources across the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 05344 appears to be generally positive among proponents who advocate for reduced regulatory burdens on local governments and businesses. Supporters believe that streamlining the permitting process will foster economic development and encourage compliance with environmental standards. However, there are concerns from environmental groups regarding potential oversight and the adequacy of protections for water quality, indicating a need for careful implementation to ensure ongoing environmental integrity.

Contention

Notable points of contention involve the balance between regulatory efficiency and environmental safeguards. Some advocates express concern that the general permit system could lead to lax oversight of pollution discharges, potentially allowing harmful practices to go unchecked. Others argue that without stringent measures, the benefits of streamlining may be offset by increased pollution risks. The discussions reflect a broader debate about the role of regulation in promoting environmental stewardship while also accommodating growth and development.