Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05386

Introduced
3/1/12  
Refer
3/1/12  
Report Pass
3/15/12  
Report Pass
3/15/12  
Refer
3/23/12  
Refer
3/23/12  
Report Pass
3/29/12  
Report Pass
3/29/12  
Engrossed
4/18/12  
Engrossed
4/18/12  
Report Pass
4/20/12  

Caption

An Act Concerning Revisions To The Insurance Statutes.

Impact

The fiscal implications of HB 05386 reflect a concerted effort to streamline the licensing process for insurance companies. By setting clear filing fees, reporting requirements, and compliance protocols, the bill seeks to mitigate risks associated with the under-regulation of insurance entities. With amendments aimed at enhancing the financial oversight of insurance companies, including the provision for actuarial certifications for reserve liabilities, the bill could result in a stronger financial framework for the insurance market, potentially reducing taxpayer exposure to insolvencies in the insurance sector.

Summary

House Bill 05386 proposes significant revisions to the existing insurance statutes, aimed at enhancing regulatory compliance and administrative efficiency within the insurance sector. The bill consolidates various provisions concerning insurance operations, licensing requirements for insurance companies, and the roles of the Insurance Commissioner in supervising these entities. Key provisions include new regulations surrounding the financing of insurance premiums and alterations to the fiscal accountability of insurance providers, which are intended to promote transparency and accountability in the industry.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be supportive among regulatory bodies and insurance professionals who favor increased oversight and standardization in insurance practices. Proponents argue that this legislation is a necessary update to antiquated statutes, aligning local laws with advancing national standards. Conversely, some industry stakeholders express concerns regarding the potential administrative burdens that may arise from more stringent compliance regulations, fearing that such obligations could inhibit operational flexibility and drive up costs for insurers, subsequently impacting consumers.

Contention

Notable points of contention focus on the balance between effective regulation and operational flexibility for insurance companies. While many support tighter regulations to protect consumers and ensure industry stability, some argue that excessive oversight could stifle innovation and competition within the insurance market. Additionally, there are concerns regarding the increasing reporting obligations placed on insurers, which could disproportionately impact smaller firms and hinder their ability to compete with larger, more established companies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB06322

An Act Concerning The Legislative Commissioners' Recommendations For Technical And Minor Changes To The Insurance And Related Statutes.

CT SB00411

An Act Concerning The Insurance Holding Company System Regulatory Act.

CT SB00368

An Act Concerning The Insurance Department's Market Conduct Authority And Data Call Confidentiality, Authorizing Multistate Health Care Centers In Connecticut, Eliminating A Health Carrier Utilization Review Report Filing Requirement, And Concerning Licensure Of Single Purpose Dental Health Care Centers.

CT HB06391

An Act Concerning The Insurance Department's Recommendations Regarding The General Statutes.

CT SB00013

An Act Reducing Prescription Drug Prices.

CT SB00009

An Act Concerning The Rate Approval Process For Certain Health Insurance Policies.

CT SB00907

An Act Concerning Changes To The Insurance Statutes.

CT HB05503

An Act Concerning Insurance Market Conduct And Insurance Licensing, The Insurance Department's Technical Corrections And Other Revisions To The Insurance Statutes And Captive Insurance.