Connecticut House Bill HB05511

Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/13/12
• Refer: 3/13/12
• Report Pass: 4/2/12
• Refer: 4/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/18/12
• Engrossed: 5/8/12
• Report Pass: 5/9/12
• Chaptered: 5/30/12
• Enrolled: 6/1/12
• Vetoed: 6/15/12

Caption

An Act Concerning The Budget, Special Assessment And Assignment Of Future Income Approval Process In Common Interest Ownership Communities.

Impact

The bill introduces specific requirements for executive boards to provide summaries of their proposed budgets and assessments to unit owners. It mandates that unit owners have a reasonable opportunity to comment on any loan agreements, bolstering the participatory rights of residents. Importantly, the bill stipulates that if a proposed budget or special assessment is rejected, the last approved budget continues to be in effect until a new one is adopted, thereby preventing financial confusion or instability within these communities. This could significantly impact financial planning and resource allocation within common interest communities across the state.

Summary

House Bill 5511, known as An Act Concerning The Budget, Special Assessment And Assignment Of Future Income Approval Process In Common Interest Ownership Communities, aims to enhance the governance and financial management of common interest communities (CICs). It establishes clear protocols for the adoption of proposed budgets and special assessments by the executive boards of these communities, ensuring that unit owners are adequately informed and involved in financial decisions that affect them. This initiative responds to growing concerns about transparency and accountability in the financial operations of homeowners associations and similar entities.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 5511 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among local community advocates who desire greater financial transparency and accountability from their governing bodies. Legislators have emphasized the need for clearer communication and better involvement of community members in financial decisions. However, there may be some apprehension from members of executive boards who feel that the new requirements could complicate administrative processes and slow down decision-making.

Contention

Some points of contention surrounding the bill include concerns about the additional bureaucracy it imposes on executive boards, particularly regarding the requirements for proposed special assessments and budgets. Opponents may argue that while the intent is to enhance transparency, the regulations could hinder the boards' ability to act swiftly in financial matters, especially in emergencies. The effectiveness of the provisions, particularly regarding the assignment of future income as security for loans, will need careful monitoring to balance transparency with effective governance in community management.