Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00036

Introduced
2/9/12  
Introduced
2/9/12  
Refer
2/9/12  
Refer
2/9/12  
Report Pass
3/2/12  
Report Pass
3/2/12  
Refer
3/14/12  
Refer
3/14/12  
Report Pass
3/20/12  
Report Pass
3/20/12  
Engrossed
4/18/12  
Engrossed
4/18/12  
Report Pass
4/20/12  

Caption

An Act Concerning Revisions To The State Codes Of Ethics.

Impact

If enacted, this bill will significantly impact state laws by modernizing and tightening the existing ethical frameworks for state officials and lobbyists. Procedures for reporting gifts, financial interests, and lobbying expenditures will be more meticulously defined, holding public officials accountable for ethical breaches. Enhanced scrutiny of lobbyists’ financial contributions and lobbying activities will help prevent corruption and conflicts of interest, thereby uplifting the integrity of public service.

Summary

Substitute Bill No. 36 is an act concerning revisions to the state codes of ethics. This bill aims to enhance the ethical standards governing the conduct of state officials and employees. Key revisions include clarifying the definitions of gifts, improving requirements for financial disclosures, and outlining stricter regulations on lobbyist activities. By establishing clearer guidelines, the bill intends to foster transparency and accountability among public officials, ensuring that they act in the best interests of the public rather than private entities.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB00036 appears to be positive among supporters who advocate for more stringent ethical regulations. They argue that these changes are necessary to restore public trust in government by minimizing opportunities for unethical behavior. However, there may also be concerns regarding the potential burden that increased regulations may place on state officials and the lobbying community, who might view these measures as overly restrictive.

Contention

Notable points of contention could stem from the definitions of 'gifts' and the requirements placed on lobbyists. Critics may argue that the bill could inhibit legitimate interactions between public officials and constituents or businesses, which could be misconstrued as unethical behavior. Additionally, the increased regulatory burden could be seen by some as an impediment to effective governance and public engagement. Balancing transparency with the ability for officials to engage openly with the community will be a crucial focus during discussions about this legislation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT SB00035

An Act Concerning The Office Of State Ethics And Revisions To The State Codes Of Ethics.

CT SB00900

An Act Concerning Revisions To The State Codes Of Ethics.

CT HB05403

An Act Concerning Revisions To The Code Of Ethics.

CT HB06272

An Act Concerning Revisions To The State Codes Of Ethics.

CT SB00474

An Act Defining Grass Roots Lobbying.

CT SB00850

An Act Amending The Code Of Ethics For Lobbyists To Redefine "expenditure" And Raise The Threshold For Lobbyist Registration.

CT HB06574

An Act Concerning Revisions To The State Codes Of Ethics.

CT SB00727

An Act Concerning Conflicts Of Interest Under The Code Of Ethics For Public Officials And State Employees.