Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00065

Introduced
2/15/12  
Introduced
2/15/12  
Refer
2/15/12  
Refer
2/15/12  
Report Pass
3/15/12  
Refer
3/23/12  
Report Pass
3/29/12  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Department Of Banking.

Impact

The overarching goal of SB00065 is to modernize the framework governing banking practices within the state. By repealing outdated statutes, the bill will replace them with updated regulations that reflect current financial practices. This shift is expected to enhance the operational efficiency of banking institutions and also to safeguard consumer interests by improving transparency and accountability within the sector. The effective date set for these changes is October 1, 2012, allowing for a transitional period for adherence to the new regulations.

Summary

SB00065, titled 'An Act Concerning The Department Of Banking', proposes significant amendments to the existing banking laws in Connecticut. This bill aims to streamline regulations across various financial institutions, including banks, credit unions, mortgage lenders, and other entities engaged in lending and debt-related services. By clarifying the definitions and applications of banking laws, the bill seeks to create a more cohesive regulatory environment that supports financial stability and consumer protection.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB00065 has been largely positive among financial institutions and regulatory advocates who appreciate the bill's focus on up-to-date regulatory practices that cater to modern banking needs. Supporters argue that this legislation is crucial for maintaining the health of Connecticut's financial ecosystem, especially given the complexities of today's banking operations. However, some stakeholders have expressed concern regarding the impact of sweeping changes on smaller community banks and credit unions, questioning whether they have the resources to adapt swiftly to new compliance requirements.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications for smaller financial entities that may struggle with the compliance costs associated with new regulations. Critics warn that while the bill aims to refine the regulatory landscape, it could unintentionally disadvantage community-based financial institutions that traditionally prioritize localized service and support over volume-driven profit models. The discussions about SB00065 highlight the ongoing debate between ensuring rigorous financial oversight and maintaining the viability of smaller banking institutions in a rapidly evolving market.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.