Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00087

Introduced
2/16/12  
Introduced
2/16/12  
Refer
2/16/12  
Refer
2/16/12  
Report Pass
3/14/12  

Caption

An Act Concerning Water Quality Certification Applications.

Impact

If enacted, the bill would streamline the process by which applicants for water quality certifications can seek recourse against unfavorable decisions from the state. This change is expected to have a significant impact on state laws concerning environmental regulations, emphasizing the importance of stakeholder engagement in environmental decision-making. By allowing hearings, the bill aims to foster accountability in the regulatory process while ensuring that applicant voices are heard in environmental governance.

Summary

SB00087, titled 'An Act Concerning Water Quality Certification Applications', aims to amend existing statutes related to the water quality certification process in Connecticut. The bill mandates that applicants can request a hearing regarding the commissioner's tentative determination on their application under Section 401 of the federal Water Pollution Control Act. This provision is designed to enhance transparency and provide applicants with a formal mechanism to contest decisions made by the Commissioner of Environmental Protection.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB00087 appears to be supportive, particularly among environmental advocates and stakeholders who emphasize the need for a robust public process in environmental regulation. The bill is seen as a positive step toward enhancing applicant rights and ensuring that decisions regarding water quality certifications are subject to scrutiny and public engagement. However, some concerns may arise regarding the potential for increased regulatory burdens on the Department of Environmental Protection, which could lead to longer processing times for certification applications.

Contention

Notable points of contention may hinge on the balance between efficient regulatory processes and the rights of applicants. Critics might argue that while the bill enhances due process, it could also lead to delays in the certification process and create challenges for the state in managing its environmental review workload. The effectiveness of the hearings proposed in the bill will be tested in practice, particularly in terms of how they are implemented and the response time of the regulatory agency involved.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.