Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00099

Introduced
2/16/12  
Introduced
2/16/12  
Refer
2/16/12  
Refer
2/16/12  
Report Pass
3/21/12  
Report Pass
3/21/12  
Refer
3/30/12  
Refer
3/30/12  
Report Pass
4/5/12  
Report Pass
4/5/12  
Engrossed
4/11/12  
Engrossed
4/11/12  
Report Pass
4/12/12  
Report Pass
4/12/12  
Chaptered
5/3/12  
Chaptered
5/3/12  
Enrolled
5/4/12  
Enrolled
5/4/12  
Passed
5/8/12  

Caption

An Act Concerning Letters Of Protection.

Impact

The introduction of SB00099 aims to enhance transparency in the interactions between healthcare providers and patients involved in personal injury lawsuits. By requiring written disclosure, the bill seeks to ensure that patients are fully informed about the payment terms related to their medical care, hopefully leading to better decision-making and management of patient expectations. This could potentially reduce disputes over billing and services rendered, creating a clearer understanding of financial obligations upon receiving treatment.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 99, titled 'An Act Concerning Letters of Protection,' establishes requirements for physicians and physical therapists when treating patients who have suffered personal injuries. Specifically, it mandates that licensed healthcare providers disclose in writing during consultations whether they will accept letters of protection, which guarantee payment for medical services from the proceeds of any settlement or judgment related to the patient’s personal injury case. The bill also requires providers to inform patients about the estimated costs for opinions regarding their injuries, diagnoses, treatment plans, and prognoses.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00099 appears to be generally positive among legislators focused on patient rights and transparency in healthcare. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary measure to protect consumers in the complex environment of personal injury claims. There may be concerns raised by healthcare providers regarding the administrative implications of implementing these disclosures, but the overall view seems to support enhanced communication between patients and providers.

Contention

While the bill's primary objective is to provide clarity, some stakeholders may contend that additional bureaucracy could complicate the treatment process for patients already navigating the challenges of personal injury cases. Critics may also argue that it places an extra burden on healthcare providers, particularly those in emergency or acute care situations, where immediate care is paramount and lengthy disclosures may hinder timely treatment. Nonetheless, the bill stands to potentially streamline financial agreements in personal injury cases, aligning treatment with legal processes more effectively.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.