Connecticut Senate Bill SB00343

Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/2/12
• Refer: 3/2/12
• Report Pass: 3/23/12
• Refer: 4/4/12
• Report Pass: 4/11/12
• Refer: 4/17/12
• Report Pass: 4/19/12

Caption

An Act Concerning Intervention In Permit Proceedings Pursuant To The Environmental Protection Act Of 1971.

Impact

The bill proposes significant revisions to existing laws regarding intervention in environmental permit proceedings. It mandates that any verified pleading for intervention must specify the nature of the pollution or impairment and disclose the individuals or entities funding the intervention. This requirement is intended to increase transparency, ensuring that stakeholders in environmental decisions are not just represented, but that their interests are clear and accountable. The amendment of Section 22a-19 seeks to balance the interests of developers with the community's right to protect their environment.

Summary

SB00343, titled 'An Act Concerning Intervention in Permit Proceedings Pursuant to the Environmental Protection Act of 1971,' aims to enhance public participation in environmental regulatory processes. This bill allows any individual or entity to intervene in administrative, licensing, or judicial review proceedings if they can demonstrate that the affected actions involve unreasonable pollution or impairment of the state's natural resources. It emphasizes the importance of community engagement in ensuring the public trust is maintained regarding natural resources such as air and water.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SB00343 is largely supportive among environmental advocacy groups and community stakeholders. They view it as a positive step toward greater accountability and inclusivity in environmental decision-making processes. However, there are contrasting viewpoints from industry representatives who argue that increased intervention could lead to delays and complications in the permitting process, potentially hindering economic development and innovation in various sectors.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB00343 include concerns over the potential for abuse of the intervention process by interest groups to stall economic projects. While advocates stress the importance of protecting the public trust, opponents fear that the bill may facilitate excessive delays in regulatory approvals, which could create barriers for businesses seeking to navigate environmental compliance. The balance between environmental stewardship and economic growth remains a focal point of discussion among lawmakers and constituents.