Connecticut Senate Bill SB00351

Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/5/12
• Refer: 3/5/12
• Report Pass: 3/21/12
• Refer: 3/30/12
• Report Pass: 4/5/12
• Refer: 4/10/12
• Report Pass: 4/16/12
• Report Pass: 4/18/12
• Engrossed: 4/26/12
• Report Pass: 4/28/12
• Chaptered: 5/23/12
• Enrolled: 5/25/12
• Passed: 6/8/12

Caption

An Act Concerning Certain Cemetery Erosion Mitigation Efforts Within The Coastal Boundary And The Appeal Of Certain Decisions Under The Water Pollution Control Act.

Impact

The legislation modifies policies regarding development and management within coastal boundaries. It allows for increased flexibility in managing cemetery properties that are at risk due to coastal erosion, promoting more robust protective measures. The amendments outlined in the bill also emphasize the necessity for local governments to engage in proactive planning and management of coastal resources, assuring that solutions are environmentally sustainable and address both public safety and conservation concerns.

Summary

Senate Bill 351, titled 'An Act Concerning Certain Cemetery Erosion Mitigation Efforts Within The Coastal Boundary And The Appeal Of Certain Decisions Under The Water Pollution Control Act', focuses on mitigating erosion issues that affect cemeteries located within coastal areas. The bill aims to amend existing state regulations to enhance the management of burial grounds threatened by coastal erosion, ensuring that measures are taken to protect these sites which may hold significant historical and cultural value. By establishing clearer guidelines for local authorities and agencies, the bill intends to facilitate a more cohesive approach to addressing environmental challenges posed by coastlines.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 351 appears to be supportive, particularly among stakeholders who emphasize the importance of preserving cemeteries and protecting coastal resources. Advocacy groups focused on historical preservation are likely to welcome such measures. However, there may be some apprehension regarding the extent of local control that municipalities may retain, as the bill could potentially lead to increased state oversight in local land use decisions if not carefully managed.

Contention

The bill's approach to easing the appeal process for decisions made under the Water Pollution Control Act has raised questions about balancing immediate action against long-term considerations. Some may argue for the necessity of rigorous assessments before permitting any construction or modification activities near coastal areas to prevent potential environmental harm.