Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00410

Introduced
3/8/12  
Refer
3/8/12  
Report Pass
3/20/12  
Report Pass
3/20/12  
Refer
3/30/12  
Refer
3/30/12  
Report Pass
4/5/12  
Report Pass
4/5/12  
Engrossed
4/27/12  
Engrossed
4/27/12  
Report Pass
4/30/12  
Report Pass
4/30/12  
Chaptered
5/23/12  

Caption

An Act Concerning Adverse Determination Reviews.

Impact

If enacted, SB 410 will significantly impact the operations of health carriers and their obligations toward covered persons. Specifically, it introduces stricter regulations for how health carriers must manage and communicate regarding disputes over benefit decisions. This includes requirements to provide documentation and evidence supporting adverse decisions and enhances the rights of individuals to challenge these determinations through an external review process. By standardizing these procedures, the bill seeks to improve transparency and accountability in health care decision-making.

Summary

Senate Bill 410, also known as the Act Concerning Adverse Determination Reviews, aims to enhance the procedures surrounding adverse determinations made by health carriers regarding health benefit plans. The bill mandates that health carriers establish clear written procedures for reviewing grievances that stem from adverse determinations, particularly those based on medical necessity. It outlines specific timeframes for making determinations, ensuring that patients receive prompt responses to their care requests. The legislation also emphasizes the need for health carriers to notify covered persons about the reasons for adverse determinations and the associated grievance processes available to them.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 410 appears to be largely positive among advocates for patient rights and health care transparency. Supporters argue that the bill is a necessary step toward empowerment for individuals dealing with health insurance disputes. However, there may be some dissent from health carriers who view the increased regulatory requirements as burdensome and potentially detrimental to their operations, creating a landscape where adversarial relationships between insurers and patients may become more pronounced.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB 410 include the balance between the rights of patients and the operational freedoms of health carriers. While the bill seeks to protect covered individuals from unjust adverse decisions, health carriers have raised concerns about the increase in their administrative responsibilities. Additionally, the bill's implementation may lead to longer processing times for claims due to the additional scrutiny required, potentially resulting in delays for patients. This dynamic reflects larger ongoing debates around regulations in the health insurance industry.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB06557

An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The Legislative Program Review And Investigations Committee Concerning The Health Carrier Utilization Review And Grievance Process.

CT SB00186

An Act Concerning Dispensation And Insurance Coverage Of A Prescribed Drug During Review Of An Adverse Determination Or A Final Adverse Determination.

CT HB06612

An Act Concerning The Health Insurance Grievance Process For Adverse Determinations, The Office Of The Healthcare Advocate And Mental Health Parity Compliance Checks.

CT HB06586

An Act Concerning Prior Authorizations And Health Care Provider Contracts.

CT SB01158

An Act Concerning Utilization Review, Grievances And External Appeals Processes Of Health Carriers.

CT SB00006

An Act Concerning Utilization Review And Health Care Contracts, Health Insurance Coverage For Newborns And Step Therapy.

CT SB00341

An Act Concerning Participation By Covered Persons, Authorized Representatives And Health Care Professionals In Utilization Reviews.

CT HB06308

An Act Concerning Healthcare Reform.