Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00443

Introduced
3/15/12  
Introduced
3/15/12  
Refer
3/15/12  
Refer
3/15/12  
Report Pass
3/28/12  
Refer
4/9/12  
Refer
4/9/12  

Caption

An Act Concerning Illegal Electronic Monitoring.

Impact

If enacted, SB00443 would amend state laws to criminalize the act of illegal electronic monitoring, classifying it as a class A misdemeanor. This change would deter unauthorized surveillance and tracking, holding individuals accountable for infringing on the privacy of others. The bill outlines specific exemptions, including instances where parents track minors, law enforcement officers performing their official duties, and authorized tracking of company fleet vehicles, thus balancing privacy rights with necessary monitoring in certain contexts.

Summary

SB00443, titled 'An Act Concerning Illegal Electronic Monitoring,' aims to establish legal parameters regarding the use of electronic monitoring devices to track individuals without their consent. The bill defines an electronic monitoring device broadly, including GPS trackers and devices embedded in cellular phones. By prohibiting unauthorized usage of such devices, the bill intends to enhance individual privacy rights and prevent potential abuses of tracking technology.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00443 appears to be largely supportive among lawmakers and privacy advocacy groups, who see it as an important step in protecting citizens from unauthorized tracking. However, some concerns were raised regarding its potential implications for law enforcement and parental monitoring, with advocates arguing that the exceptions provided might allow for circumvention of the bill's intent. This indicates a complex discussion surrounding privacy versus safety and monitoring rights.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the exemptions granted within the bill. Critics express concern that by allowing certain parties like law enforcement and parents to bypass restrictions, it could lead to a slippery slope where individuals may misuse tracking devices under the guise of legality. The debate reflects broader tensions about privacy rights versus public safety and underscores the necessity for clear guidelines to prevent abuse while ensuring accountability.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.