An Act Requiring A Cost-benefit Analysis Of Proposed State-funded Economic Development Capital Investments.
Impact
The bill's implementation is poised to modify how economic development projects are evaluated at the state level. By instituting a required cost-benefit analysis, state agencies will have to substantiate the economic viability of proposals before funding is allocated. This change may lead to a more judicious use of taxpayer resources, as projects that do not demonstrate tangible economic benefits could be rejected. The primary objective is to foster accountability and make informed decisions concerning large-scale investments in community development.
Summary
House Bill 05302 mandates a cost-benefit analysis for any proposed state-funded economic development capital investments exceeding fifteen million dollars. This measure requires the Office of Policy and Management to project the economic gains from such investments, specifically estimating tax revenues linked to temporary or permanent job creation. The bill aims to ensure that any state funding provided produces a verifiable positive economic impact before the State Bond Commission can authorize any bonding for these projects. This reflects a focused approach to financial oversight in state funding initiatives.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB05302 appears to be supportive among fiscal conservatives and those advocating for accountability in government spending. Proponents believe that the bill will lead to better management of state funds and encourage more effective economic strategies. However, there may be concerns raised by parties who fear that stringent evaluation metrics could hinder vital community projects by imposing bureaucratic obstacles during the approval process.
Contention
Notable points of contention might arise regarding the criteria used for cost-benefit analysis and how thoroughly these analyses will consider qualitative factors, such as social and environmental impacts. Critics argue that an overly rigid focus on quantitative measures could potentially dismiss essential projects that offer significant non-monetary benefits. Therefore, balancing economic metrics with community needs will be crucial in the application of the bill.
An Act Concerning The Department Of Economic And Community Development's Recommendations For Revisions To The Jobsct Program And The Commerce And Related Statutes.
An Act Establishing A Working Group To Develop An Economic Development And Tourism Plan For The Greater Mystic Area Of The Towns Of Groton, New London And Stonington.
An Act Authorizing And Adjusting Bonds Of The State And Concerning Provisions Related To State And Municipal Tax Administration, General Government And School Building Projects.