Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05392

Introduced
1/18/13  
Introduced
1/18/13  
Refer
1/18/13  
Refer
1/18/13  
Refer
2/4/13  
Refer
2/4/13  
Report Pass
3/14/13  
Refer
3/25/13  
Report Pass
4/2/13  
Report Pass
4/2/13  
Refer
4/10/13  

Caption

An Act Providing Consumer Protection To Clients Of Exchange Facilitators For Tax Deferred Exchanges.

Impact

With the implementation of HB 05392, exchange facilitators will be held to stricter regulatory standards, promoting transparent practices in how client funds are managed. By requiring facilitators to maintain substantial financial safeguards, such as fidelity bonds and insurance policies, the bill enhances the security of client investments. This change represents a significant step toward protecting consumers in financial transactions that involve large sums of money and substantial risk.

Summary

House Bill 05392 aims to provide consumer protection to clients of exchange facilitators involved in tax-deferred exchanges. The bill defines the roles and responsibilities of exchange facilitators, including the requirement to maintain fidelity bonds, ensure the separation and proper management of exchange funds, and adhere to ethical standards in their dealings. It seeks to foster trust in the exchange process, which is particularly pertinent given the complexities of tax-deferral exchanges in real estate transactions.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding the legislation appears positive, particularly among consumer advocates and stakeholders within the real estate sector. Many view the bill as a necessary measure to ensure accountability and protect consumers from potential fraud and mismanagement. However, there are concerns from some industry players regarding potential overregulation that could burden small operators or hinder the efficiency of exchanges.

Contention

While the bill's intent is well-received, there are notable points of contention. Critics express concerns that the requirements imposed on exchange facilitators may inhibit small businesses from participating in the market, thereby reducing competition. Additionally, there are worries about the cost implications for facilitators, which may ultimately be passed on to clients. The discussions highlight a balancing act between necessary consumer protections and fostering a competitive, accessible market for exchange transactions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2013

Property taxation: new construction: damaged or destroyed property.

CA AB1500

Property taxation: application of base year value: disaster relief.

CA AB245

Property taxation: application of base year value: disaster relief.

DC B25-0486

Uniform Community Property Disposition at Death Act of 2023

CA SB964

Property tax: tax-defaulted property sales.

CA SB603

Property taxation: transfer of base year value: disaster relief.

CA SB1091

Property taxation: transfer of base year value: disaster relief.

HI HB1398

Relating To Property.