Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05542

Introduced
1/22/13  
Introduced
1/22/13  
Refer
1/22/13  
Refer
1/22/13  
Refer
3/8/13  
Refer
3/8/13  
Report Pass
3/21/13  
Report Pass
3/21/13  
Refer
4/1/13  
Refer
4/1/13  
Report Pass
4/8/13  
Report Pass
4/8/13  
Refer
4/23/13  
Refer
4/23/13  
Report Pass
4/29/13  

Caption

An Act Requiring The Display Of House Numbers.

Impact

If enacted, HB 5542 would establish minimum standards for how house numbers should be displayed, which could lead to modifications in local codes and regulations governing residential properties. By delineating clear requirements, the bill sets a statewide standard that could supplant more lenient or varied municipal practices already in place. As a result, homeowners in different towns may need to update the way their house numbers are displayed, thereby influencing local property regulations and compliance efforts. This shift could also affect neighborhood aesthetics and local enforcement efforts regarding home improvement standards.

Summary

House Bill 5542 mandates that residential property owners display their house numbers prominently. The purpose of this legislation is to enhance public safety by ensuring that emergency services can easily locate residential buildings when needed. By requiring that house numbers be affixed in a way that adheres to specified size, color, and placement criteria, the bill aims to improve the visibility and legibility of these crucial identifiers. This regulation is intended to facilitate quicker response times for emergency personnel and other services requiring prompt identification of residences.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 5542 appears to be supportive among safety advocates who emphasize the importance of easily identifiable addresses in emergency situations. However, there may be some contention among homeowners regarding the specifics of the legislation, such as the height requirements and the penalties for non-compliance. While proponents champion the bill for its public safety benefits, critics may voice concerns about government overreach and potential costs associated with complying with new display standards. This divergence in opinion reflects broader debates about the balance between safety measures and property rights.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the height and visibility standards mandated by the bill, which some homeowners may find impractical or unnecessarily burdensome. For residents living in unique circumstances, such as those with unusual property layouts or those living in remote areas, the strict adherence to these guidelines could present challenges. Additionally, the bill establishes penalties for violations, which has raised discussions about the appropriateness of such infraction-based approaches to enforcing safety regulations. The discourse surrounding HB 5542 underscores the tension between enhancing public safety and maintaining reasonable expectations for homeowners.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.