Connecticut House Bill HB05598

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/13
• Refer: 1/23/13
• Report Pass: 3/4/13
• Report Pass: 4/1/13
• Refer: 4/12/13
• Report Pass: 4/18/13
• Engrossed: 5/2/13
• Report Pass: 5/6/13
• Chaptered: 6/19/13
• Enrolled: 6/26/13
• Passed: 7/11/13

Caption

An Act Concerning The Department Of Administrative Services And The Disposition Of Surplus State Property, Short Term Emergency Leases, The Definition Of Executive Session And Duplicative Statements Of Financial Interest.

Impact

The bill is designed to enhance the efficiency of state property management and utilize surplus properties effectively for public needs. It expands the authority of the Commissioner of Administrative Services to act swiftly in leasing to address urgent requirements for emergency shelters or subsidized housing. Furthermore, it exempts certain state projects, like the Connecticut Juvenile Training School project, from specific bureaucratic processes to accelerate their development. This change could potentially lead to more timely support for vulnerable populations requiring immediate help, such as those experiencing homelessness.

Summary

House Bill 5598 aims to amend laws concerning the Department of Administrative Services in Connecticut, specifically regarding the disposal of surplus state property, short-term emergency leases, and the definition of executive sessions. The bill seeks to streamline the process for leasing or selling state land, particularly for it to be used for purposes related to homelessness or low to moderate-income housing. A key provision allows the Commissioner of Administrative Services to enter into short-term leases without requiring prior approval from various state entities in emergency situations, thus facilitating quicker responses to urgent needs.

Sentiment

The reception of HB 5598 has generally been positive among lawmakers focused on improving services for the homeless and ensuring that surplus state properties are put to good use. The bill has garnered bipartisan support, reflecting a shared understanding of the importance of addressing homelessness and affordable housing issues. However, there are concerns regarding oversight with the expanded powers granted to state officials, and some lawmakers caution that the rushed processes might not always result in the best outcomes for the populations they aim to assist.

Contention

Notable points of contention center around the potential for reduced local control over state property management decisions and the implications of broadening the definition of executive sessions. Critics argue this could diminish public transparency regarding how state assets are allocated and used, particularly in the context of executive sessions that exclude public input. Additionally, there are debates around ensuring that the urgency of emergency situations does not override equitable decision-making related to state properties and community needs.