Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05686

Introduced
1/23/13  
Introduced
1/23/13  
Refer
1/23/13  
Refer
1/23/13  
Refer
3/18/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning An Increase In The Minimum Base Period Wages Required For Unemployment Compensation.

Impact

The potential implications of this bill on state laws include a re-evaluation of how unemployment benefits are structured and the criteria for eligibility. An increase in the base period wages could impact individuals' access to unemployment compensation and may have significant ramifications for labor markets, business operations, and the economic environment in Connecticut. The findings of the Labor Department's study could inform future legislative proposals aimed at optimizing the balance between providing support for unemployed individuals and ensuring that businesses remain viable and competitive.

Summary

House Bill 05686 seeks to initiate a study by the Labor Department regarding the potential impacts of increasing the minimum base period wages required for unemployment compensation on businesses in Connecticut. The bill is a response to ongoing discussions about improving the unemployment compensation system and its implications for businesses and the overall economy. The objective of the study is to assess whether changing the threshold for unemployment benefits could potentially enhance the health and productivity of businesses within the state. This signifies a legislative move towards understanding the interface between policy adjustments and economic vitality.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 05686 is likely characterized by a mix of cautious optimism and concern. Supporters may view the bill as a proactive step towards enhancing the state's workforce by ensuring fair unemployment compensation that aligns with current economic conditions. Conversely, there might be apprehension from business stakeholders about the potential costs associated with increased wages and how this could affect their ability to hire and retain employees.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from differing views on the appropriate level of support for unemployed individuals versus the needs of businesses. Critics of the bill could argue that increasing the wage threshold for unemployment benefits might impose additional burdens on employers, potentially leading to reduced hiring or affecting job retention. The debate is expected to touch upon broader themes of economic recovery, business sustainability, and the social safety net, highlighting the complexities involved in adjusting unemployment compensation policies to benefit both individuals and businesses effectively.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05271

An Act Increasing The Unemployment Compensation Threshold For Agricultural Employers.

CT HB05270

An Act Increasing The Threshold Amount For Felony Unemployment Compensation Fraud.

CT SB00221

An Act Concerning The Minimum Fair Wage And Service Charges.

CT HB05164

An Act Concerning Unemployment Benefits.

CT HB05325

An Act Concerning Compensation Paid To Injured Employees Under The Workers' Compensation Act.

CT HB05090

An Act Concerning Funding For Training Law Enforcement Officers.

CT HB05003

An Act Concerning Child And Family Nutrition.

CT SB00439

An Act Concerning Compensation For Persons Who Are Wrongfully Incarcerated.

CT SB00223

An Act Concerning Workers' Compensation.

CT SB00007

An Act Concerning Connecticut Paid Sick Days.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.