Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06014 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1-General Assembly Committee Bill No. 6014
2-January Session, 2013 LCO No. 4514
3- *04514HB06014PS_*
1+General Assembly Proposed Bill No. 6014
2+January Session, 2013 LCO No. 1407
43 Referred to Committee on PUBLIC SAFETY AND SECURITY
54 Introduced by:
6-(PS)
5+REP. BUTLER, 72nd Dist.
76
87 General Assembly
98
10-Committee Bill No. 6014
9+Proposed Bill No. 6014
1110
1211 January Session, 2013
1312
14-LCO No. 4514
15-
16-*04514HB06014PS_*
13+LCO No. 1407
1714
1815 Referred to Committee on PUBLIC SAFETY AND SECURITY
1916
2017 Introduced by:
2118
22-(PS)
19+REP. BUTLER, 72nd Dist.
2320
2421 AN ACT CONCERNING THE SAFE USE OF ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS.
2522
2623 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:
2724
28-Section 1. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2013) Each police basic training program conducted or administered by the Division of State Police within the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection or the Police Officer Standards and Training Council established under section 7-294b of the general statutes shall provide a minimum of four hours training on the use of an electronic defense weapon, as defined in section 53a-3 of the general statutes, and each police review training program conducted or administered by said department or council shall provide a minimum of one hour of such training. Such training shall include, but not be limited to, instruction on (1) the capabilities and limitations of the technology in terms of its effectiveness, (2) the effects that the use of an electronic defense weapon may have on a person, including, but not limited to, adverse medical effects, and (3) the parts of the body that should not be a target of electronic defense weapon use.
29-
30-Sec. 2. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2013) (a) For the purposes of this section and sections 3 and 4 of this act, "electronic defense weapon" has the same meaning as provided in section 53a-3 of the general statutes, and "peace officer" has the same meaning as provided in section 53a-3 of the general statutes.
31-
32-(b) No peace officer shall use an electronic defense weapon in the performance of such officer's duties unless such officer has successfully completed the training required under section 1 of this act.
33-
34-(c) Any peace officer who uses an electronic defense weapon on a person shall immediately seek medical attention for such person.
35-
36-(d) Any peace officer who violates any provision of this section shall be subject to disciplinary action in accordance with the procedures of such officer's employing agency.
37-
38-Sec. 3. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2013) Each law enforcement agency that authorizes the use of electronic defense weapons by officers of such agency shall: (1) Develop and maintain an internal policy that provides guidelines on the use of electronic defense weapons; (2) require officers to document the use of electronic defense weapons in use-of-force reports; (3) download and archive on a regular basis data that is recorded by an electronic defense weapon when it is used; and (4) prepare and make available to the public an annual report that details the use of electronic defense weapons by officers of such agency including data downloaded from electronic defense weapons after their use, use-of-force reports and statistics on such use including, but not limited to, the name of the officer who used the electronic defense weapon, the race and gender of the person on whom the electronic defense weapon was used, the injury, if any, suffered by such person, the number of times the electronic defense weapon was activated and used on such person and, if the electronic defense weapon had different usage modes, the mode used. The information and data compiled under this section may be used in any judicial or administrative proceeding.
39-
40-Sec. 4. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2013) Any person on whom an electronic defense weapon has been used by a peace officer who has not complied with section 2 of this act or whose employing law enforcement agency has not complied with section 3 of this act, may bring a civil action for damages against the law enforcement agency and any person with supervisory authority over such officer. The court may award costs, expert witness fees and a reasonable attorney's fee to a plaintiff who prevails in such action. The court may order injunctive or other equitable relief as it deems appropriate.
41-
42-
43-
44-
45-This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
46-Section 1 October 1, 2013 New section
47-Sec. 2 October 1, 2013 New section
48-Sec. 3 October 1, 2013 New section
49-Sec. 4 October 1, 2013 New section
50-
51-This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
52-
53-Section 1
54-
55-October 1, 2013
56-
57-New section
58-
59-Sec. 2
60-
61-October 1, 2013
62-
63-New section
64-
65-Sec. 3
66-
67-October 1, 2013
68-
69-New section
70-
71-Sec. 4
72-
73-October 1, 2013
74-
75-New section
25+That the general statutes be amended to require police officers to undergo basic and review training in the use of electronic defense weapons, prohibit police officers using an electronic defense weapon in the performance of their duties unless they have completed such training, require law enforcement agencies that allow their officers to use electronic defense weapons to develop and maintain a policy on the use of such weapons and document the circumstances when such weapons are used, and authorize any person on whom an electronic defense weapon has been used to bring a civil action if the officer had not completed the required training or if the law enforcement agency had not developed and maintained a policy on the use of electronic defense weapons.
7626
7727 Statement of Purpose:
7828
7929 To ensure the safe use of electronic defense weapons by law enforcement agencies.
80-
81-[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets. Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.]
82-
83-
84-
85-Co-Sponsors: REP. BUTLER, 72nd Dist.; REP. MCCRORY, 7th Dist. REP. HEWETT, 39th Dist.; REP. CLEMONS, 124th Dist. REP. MORRIS, 140th Dist.; REP. VARGAS, 6th Dist. REP. CANDELARIA, 95th Dist.; REP. AYALA, 128th Dist.
86-
87-Co-Sponsors:
88-
89-REP. BUTLER, 72nd Dist.; REP. MCCRORY, 7th Dist.
90-
91-REP. HEWETT, 39th Dist.; REP. CLEMONS, 124th Dist.
92-
93-REP. MORRIS, 140th Dist.; REP. VARGAS, 6th Dist.
94-
95-REP. CANDELARIA, 95th Dist.; REP. AYALA, 128th Dist.
96-
97-H.B. 6014